Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Farming
Conservation agriculture (CA) combines three fundamental principles: minimal soil disturbance through reduced tillage, maintaining biomass residues on the soil surface, and crop rotation with nitrogen-fixing legumes or cover crops. This approach has demonstrated its efficacy in dryland wheat farming systems, offering multiple advantages. CA enhances soil quality, improves water use efficiency, stabilizes yields, reduces input costs, and minimizes energy and time demands. Furthermore, it enriches soil biodiversity, mitigates emissions, and sequesters carbon, benefiting both farmers and the environment.
This technology is TAAT1 validated.
Technology integrated in the CREW project in Ethiopia (East Africa), in the ENSURE and TAISP projects in the region East Africa, and in the SEWPP project in Sudan (North-East Africa).
Beneficiaries
Ethiopia (CREW): 500,000 households (~2.3 million people)
ENSURE (Regional): 3,000,000 farmers (50% women)
Sudan (SEWPP): 400,000 smallholder households
Tanzania (TAISP): 1,200,000 households (40% women & youth)
Bugdet:
Ethiopia (CREW): USD 94.30M
ENSURE: USD 13.14M
Sudan (SEWPP): UA 56.78M (~USD 74M)
Tanzania (TAISP): UA 62.27M (~USD 84.07M)
Implementation period:
CREW (Ethiopia): Oct 2023 – Dec 2028
ENSURE: 2024–2027
SEWPP (Sudan): Sep 2022 – Jun 2025
TAISP (Tanzania): Sep 2022 – Jun 2025
Adoption figures
Ethiopia (CREW): yields 3.04 → 4.0 t/ha
ENSURE: 149,940 trained; 9,996 demos; 3,332 innovation platforms
Sudan (SEWPP): wheat area expands 330,000 → 400,000 hectares
Tanzania (TAISP): yields increase (wheat: 1.5 → 3.0 t/ha; rice: 2.0 → 3.0 t/ha); +1 million MT food production
Increase in yield
water use efficiency
increase in income
Increase in profit from wheat production
Open source / open access
The technology enhances crop yields, ensuring food security and profitability for farmers. By minimizing soil disruption and conserving moisture, it reduces water and fertilizer needs, while also preventing erosion and chemical runoff, promoting environmental sustainability. Lower input costs and increased resilience to climate variability further benefit farmers economically and environmentally.
To assess the cost implications for your business, consider that the three-year average total production cost for wheat-chickpea rotation under Conservation Agriculture (CA) in Morocco is USD 740 per hectare compared to USD 838 per hectare for conventional tillage systems.
For profit estimation, note that in Mexico, profits from wheat production increase by USD 923 per hectare under CA management instead of intensive tillage.
Access to this technology is likely available through agricultural extension services, research institutions, local farming communities, and organizations dedicated to sustainable agriculture and rural development.
Moreover, explore opportunities to integrate this technology with complementary approaches, such as Heat and Drought Tolerant Wheat Varieties and pest-resistant wheat varieties.
Adults 18 and over: Positive high
The poor: Positive high
Under 18: Positive low
Women: Positive high
Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable
Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement
Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity
Carbon footprint: Much less carbon released
Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health
Soil quality: Improves soil health and fertility
Water use: Much less water used
Scaling Readiness describes how complete a technology’s development is and its ability to be scaled. It produces a score that measures a technology’s readiness along two axes: the level of maturity of the idea itself, and the level to which the technology has been used so far.
Each axis goes from 0 to 9 where 9 is the “ready-to-scale” status. For each technology profile in the e-catalogs we have documented the scaling readiness status from evidence given by the technology providers. The e-catalogs only showcase technologies for which the scaling readiness score is at least 8 for maturity of the idea and 7 for the level of use.
The graph below represents visually the scaling readiness status for this technology, you can see the label of each level by hovering your mouse cursor on the number.
Read more about scaling readiness ›
Uncontrolled environment: tested
Common use by projects NOT connected to technology provider
| Maturity of the idea | Level of use | |||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||
Enabling Environments for Sustainable Regional Agriculture Extension (ENSURE)
Ethiopia – Climate Resilient Wheat Value Chain Development Project (CREW)
Tanzania Agricultural Inputs Support Project (TAISP)
Sudan Emergency Wheat Production Project (SEWPP)
Success Factors: Use of TAAT heat-tolerant varieties; WFP’s logistical capacity; digital e-voucher platforms for transparent targeting
Constraints: High inflation, heat stress (>38°C), political instability
| Country | Testing ongoing | Tested | Adopted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burkina Faso | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Ethiopia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Kenya | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Niger | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Nigeria | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| South Sudan | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Sudan | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Zambia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Zimbabwe | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
| AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arid | ||||
| Semiarid | ||||
| Subhumid | – | – | – | – |
| Humid | – | – | – | – |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
Last updated on 16 April 2026