Hapa Nets for Mass Fingerling Hatchery Production
The "Hapa Nets for Mass Fingerling Hatchery Production" technology i a cage-like enclosures (referred to as "hapa" nets) placed within ponds to safeguard and manage brooders, hatchlings, and juvenile fish. The hapa nets come in various shapes and sizes, using materials like wooden poles and mesh nets, offering an affordable solution for hatcheries of all sizes. The nets require periodic maintenance to ensure effective functionality, but they significantly improve the management and production of fingerlings for the aquaculture industry. These nets are designed to shield fish from predators, ensuring better control over breeding, feeding, and aeration. They provide a conducive environment for fish growth, resulting in enhanced fertilization rates, reduced mortality, and increased production of fry and fingerlings. This technology is well-suited for various aquaculture species and adaptable to different water bodies such as earthen ponds, riverbeds, or concrete tanks.
This technology is TAAT1 validated.
Adults 18 and over: Positive high
It enhances livelihood opportunities by increasing fish production, creating more stable jobs in aquaculture, and improving economic returns.
The poor: Positive medium
The technology provides affordable solutions for small-scale fish farmers, improving food security and creating income opportunities, contributing to poverty alleviation.
Under 18: Positive low
This technology indirectly improves their nutrition by ensuring a consistent supply of fish, a source of protein in their diets, which helps combat malnutrition.
Women: Positive high
It supports women engaged in aquaculture by offering better management tools for fish farming, allowing them to achieve higher production rates and improved incomes.
Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable
It supports sustainable aquaculture practices that can adapt to changing climate conditions, such as fluctuating water temperatures.
Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement
It empowers farmers to adapt to climate variability with better control over fish stock and water management.
Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity
It helps preserve aquatic biodiversity by reducing overfishing of wild fish populations, supporting sustainable fish breeding.
Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released
Lowers the carbon footprint by increasing the efficiency of fish production, reducing the need for feed and other inputs.
Water use: Same amount of water used
It promotes efficient water use by improving management of fish stock, reducing the need for frequent water changes.
In the near future, this section will provide an overview of this technology's success in various contexts, details on partners offering technical support, training, and implementation monitoring, along with other valuable insights for your projects and programs. These details will be added progressively.
In the meantime, use the 'Request information' button if you need to contact us.
Per square meter
Production in hapa
Number of fish farmers in a single hatchery
Open source / open access
Country | Testing ongoing | Tested | Adopted |
---|---|---|---|
Angola | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Benin | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Botswana | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Burkina Faso | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Burundi | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Cameroon | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Central African Republic | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Côte d’Ivoire | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Djibouti | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Equatorial Guinea | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Eritrea | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Ethiopia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Ghana | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Guinea | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Kenya | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Madagascar | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Malawi | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Mali | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Mozambique | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Niger | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Nigeria | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Rwanda | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Senegal | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Sierra Leone | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
South Sudan | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Sudan | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Tanzania | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Togo | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Uganda | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Zambia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arid | ||||
Semiarid | ||||
Subhumid | ||||
Humid |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
It creates job opportunities in aquaculture and promotes sustainable economic growth.
It supports sustainable fish farming practices, reducing waste and resource use.
By increasing fish production and hatchery profitability, it helps improve incomes for smallholder farmers and fish producers.
It enhances food security by providing a reliable source of fish, an important protein in diets.
It improves resilience to climate change by making aquaculture systems more adaptable and sustainable.
Last updated on 4 October 2024