Greater yield and uniformity in tilapia farming
Mono-sex tilapia farming is a bit more complicated but it's worth it. It allows for mostly male tilapia to be grown, sometimes up to 98% male. This is done using methods like picking out males and females by hand, using hormones, or natural methods. Using specially bred tilapia (GIFT) is best for commercial farming. Using hormones can change most fish from female to male, usually about 98% of them. Another method uses changes in temperature after the fish hatch, turning about 86% of them into males. The natural method gives you all-natural males. It's important to know that with hormone-treated fish, some might look like males but genetically they're still females.
This technology is TAAT1 validated.
The technology has been integrated in the PROMAC project: in Benin
Goal: annual production of 30,000 tons of fish feed
238 actors trained in fish feed formulation under TAAT Phase I
Budget: ~USD 77.64 million
Implementation period: Dec 2023 – Dec 2028
Adults 18 and over: Positive high
The poor: Positive low
Under 18: Positive low
Women: Positive medium
Climate adaptability: Moderately adaptable
Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement
Biodiversity: No impact on biodiversity
Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released
Environmental health: Moderately improves environmental health
Soil quality: Does not affect soil health and fertility
Water use: Same amount of water used
Aquaculture development programs and fish value chain initiatives can increase fish productivity and profitability through improved mono-sex tilapia production systems.
Target high-potential aquaculture zones
Focus on areas with suitable water resources, existing fish farming activities, and growing market demand.
Support access to quality fingerlings
Facilitate the production and distribution of improved mono-sex tilapia strains through hatcheries and breeding centers.
Strengthen hatchery and farmer skills
Train operators on broodstock management, spawning, fry rearing, sex control techniques, and fingerling production.
Integrate improved production practices
Promote proper feeding, water quality management, aeration, and health monitoring to maximize growth performance.
Establish demonstration and learning sites
Use model farms to showcase productivity gains and best management practices.
Build partnerships across the aquaculture sector
Collaborate with hatcheries, research institutions, extension services, and private investors to support scaling and sustainability.
Cost of one month mono-sex fingerlings in Kenya
Weight of male fingerlings stocked in cages in 5 to 8 months of culture
Patent granted
Scaling Readiness describes how complete a technology\’s development is and its ability to be scaled. It produces a score that measures a technology\’s readiness along two axes: the level of maturity of the idea itself, and the level to which the technology has been used so far.
Each axis goes from 0 to 9 where 9 is the “ready-to-scale” status. For each technology profile in the e-catalogs we have documented the scaling readiness status from evidence given by the technology providers. The e-catalogs only showcase technologies for which the scaling readiness score is at least 8 for maturity of the idea and 7 for the level of use.
The graph below represents visually the scaling readiness status for this technology, you can see the label of each level by hovering your mouse cursor on the number.
Read more about scaling readiness ›
Uncontrolled environment: tested
Used by some intended users, in the real world
| Maturity of the idea | Level of use | |||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||
Project to Promote Aquaculture and the Competitiveness of Fisheries Value Chains (PROMAC)
| Country | Testing ongoing | Tested | Adopted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benin | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Cameroon | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Ethiopia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Kenya | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Malawi | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Nigeria | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Senegal | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Tanzania | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Uganda | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Zambia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
| AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arid | ||||
| Semiarid | ||||
| Subhumid | ||||
| Humid |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
Selecting Broodstock:
Stocking Spawning Units:
Feeding and Temperature Control:
Monitoring Ovulation in Females:
Egg Collection and Incubation:
Transferring Fry to Rearing Units:
Hormonal Treatment (Optional):
Ensuring Proper Size Distribution:
Selection and Management of Broodstock for Future Cycles:
Provision of Adequate Resources:
Last updated on 2 June 2026