Weed-free Fields, Bountiful Yields!
The "Six Steps Cassava Weed Management" technology is a comprehensive solution to the persistent issue of weed encroachment in cassava fields across Sub-Saharan Africa. By offering a decision support framework that covers various key control measures, it empowers farmers to keep their cassava crops free of weeds, resulting in significantly higher root yields. This innovative approach is adaptable to the diverse agricultural conditions and resources of small-scale farmers, making it a valuable tool for increasing cassava productivity and improving food security in the region.
This technology is TAAT1 validated.
Root yield increased
Cost for herbicide application
Cost for weed removal labor
Open source / open access
For Farmers
The “Six Steps” toolkit is indeed a valuable resource for farmers, especially those growing cassava crops. It provides decision support and recommendations for weed management and planting practices, which can be accessed free of charge from the internet. However, implementing these steps does require substantial investment from farmers.
Weed management, in particular, can be quite costly. Weed removal can take up between 30% - 50% of total labor costs, translating to approximately US $28-46 per hectare. Additionally, the application of herbicides using manual knapsack sprayers usually costs around US $20-30 per hectare. These costs are significant and highlight the importance of effective weed management strategies to ensure the profitability of cassava farming. It’s crucial for farmers to factor these costs into their budgeting and planning processes.
Also, consider undergoing training on the tool. You can also collaborate with local extension services and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) to receive support.
Adults 18 and over: Positive medium
The poor: No impact
Under 18: Positive low
Women: Positive medium
Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable
Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement
Biodiversity: No impact on biodiversity
Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released
Environmental health: Moderately improves environmental health
Soil quality: Improves soil health and fertility
Water use: A bit less water used
Country | Testing ongoing | Tested | Adopted |
---|---|---|---|
Democratic Republic of the Congo | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Nigeria | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Tanzania | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Zambia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arid | – | – | – | – |
Semiarid | – | – | ||
Subhumid | – | – | ||
Humid | – | – |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
A video demonstrating how to apply these steps is also available here.
Last updated on 26 September 2024