From Catch to Cuisine: Enhancing Fish Quality and Sustainability
This technology is a fish processing and preservation method involving the use of equipment such as solar tent dryers and smoking kilns. It addresses the challenge of fish's high perishability by improving shelf-life and enhancing taste and nutritional value. Solar dryers offer a low-cost alternative to refrigeration, and smoking kilns utilize smoke to kill microorganisms while drying the fish. These methods enable the production of various value-added fish products, providing economic opportunities, reducing post-harvest losses, and contributing to food quality and market appeal.
This technology is TAAT1 validated.
Adults 18 and over: Positive high
The poor: Positive low
Under 18: Positive low
Women: Positive high
Climate adaptability: Moderately adaptable
Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement
Biodiversity: No impact on biodiversity
Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released
Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health
Soil quality: Does not affect soil health and fertility
Water use: Same amount of water used
Fish processing and preservation technologies play a vital role in addressing several issues in the industry:
In the near future, this section will provide an overview of this technology's success in various contexts, details on partners offering technical support, training, and implementation monitoring, along with other valuable insights for your projects and programs. These details will be added progressively.
In the meantime, use the 'Request information' button if you need to contact us.
Handheld electric fish scaler
Filleting equipment
Equipment for skinning and deboning 10 to 20 fish/minute
A greenhouse-style solar dryer 15 m × 8 m with capacity of 850 kg fish per batch
Patent granted
Country | Testing ongoing | Tested | Adopted |
---|---|---|---|
Angola | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Benin | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Burundi | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Côte d’Ivoire | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Ethiopia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Ghana | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Kenya | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Madagascar | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Malawi | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Mali | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Mozambique | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Nigeria | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Rwanda | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Senegal | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Tanzania | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Togo | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Uganda | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Zambia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Zimbabwe | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arid | ||||
Semiarid | ||||
Subhumid | ||||
Humid |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
Last updated on 22 May 2024