Logo
TAAT e-catalog for Development partners
https://e-catalogs.taat-africa.org/org/technologies/low-cost-staking-for-climbing-beans
Request information View pitch brochure

Low-Cost Staking for Climbing Beans

Empowering Beans, Sustaining Growth!

The Low-Cost Staking practice offers innovative and affordable methods to address challenges in climbing bean cultivation, particularly the need for plant support. It focuses on reducing the use of wooden stakes by employing alternative materials and techniques such as tripod staking, wooden string trellises, and live plant support. These approaches aim to enhance yield while minimizing environmental damage caused by deforestation from excessive stake harvesting.

2

This technology is TAAT1 validated.

8•8

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 8/9; level of use 8/9

Project adoption1

Technology integrated in the ENSURE project.
Project Countries Beneficiaries Budget (USD) & duration Key figures
ENSURE
Enabling Environments for Sustainable Regional Agriculture Extension
  • Kenya
  • Rwanda
  • Burundi
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • South Sudan
  • Uganda
  • Tanzania
  • Direct: 3,000,000    

13.14 million

2024–2027

  • 149,940 farmers trained
  • 9,996 Training
  • 2→3.5 tons/ha cereals production expected
  • 350 agent trained 

Figures in italic are from project plans and may change during implementation.

See project details ›

Adults 18 and over: Positive medium

The poor: Positive medium

Under 18: Positive low

Women: Positive medium

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

Farmer climate change readiness: Moderate improvement

Biodiversity: No impact on biodiversity

Carbon footprint: Much less carbon released

Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health

Soil quality: Does not affect soil health and fertility

Water use: A bit less water used

Problem

  • Limited access to affordable staking materials: Resource-constrained farming communities face difficulties accessing affordable materials needed for climbing bean production.
  • Limited access to technical support: Farmers and producer organizations need practical guidance on staking design, plant spacing and the use of locally available materials.
  • Low bean productivity: Inadequate staking causes yield losses of 50–90%, limiting food production and income opportunities.
  • Dependence on harvested wood: Reliance on wooden stakes increases pressure on forest resources and creates sustainability concerns.
  • Adoption barriers: Labor requirements and limited availability of suitable materials restrict the adoption of effective staking practices.

Solution

  • Affordable staking options: Tripod staking, trellises and live plant support provide affordable alternatives to conventional wooden stakes.
  • Locally available materials: Agroforestry species, bamboo, grasses and intercrop stems provide alternative sources of plant support.
  • Improved bean productivity: Adequate staking improves plant support and reduces yield losses.
  • Capacity building: Farmer Field Schools, extension services and producer organizations can provide training on staking design, plant spacing and material use.
  • Sustainable production: Reduced dependence on harvested wood supports environmental conservation while improving climbing bean production and livelihoods.

Key points to design your program

This technology promotes innovative, low-cost staking systems for climbing beans using locally available materials and alternative plant support methods. It can be integrated into climbing bean value chain development, food security, climate-smart agriculture, sustainable intensification, agroforestry, and rural livelihood programmes. By reducing dependence on expensive wooden stakes, lowering production costs, improving land productivity, and reducing pressure on forest resources, the technology enables farmers to adopt climbing bean production more efficiently while strengthening environmental sustainability. It supports SDGs 1 (No Poverty), 2 (Zero Hunger), 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), and 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), while creating income opportunities for women, smallholder farmers, and resource-constrained households through affordable production systems.

To successfully integrate this technology, consider the following key actions:

  • Identify climbing bean production areas where limited access to affordable staking materials, high production costs, and declining forest resources constrain technology adoption and productivity.
  • Establish partnerships with the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, ProPAS, national agricultural research institutions, extension services, agroforestry programmes, and farmer organizations to support technology dissemination and technical guidance.
  • Assess the local availability of sustainable staking materials, agroforestry resources, suitable companion species, and market conditions to identify the most appropriate staking systems for each production environment.
  • Strengthen technical capacity through Farmer Field Schools by training farmers, extension agents, and producer organizations on staking design, plant spacing, efficient use of locally available materials, and integrated climbing bean production.
  • Promote integrated climbing bean production systems by facilitating access to improved climbing bean varieties, sustainable staking materials, soil fertility management practices, and locally adapted support structures.
  • Support community-based supply systems for alternative staking materials, farmer organizations, agroforestry initiatives, demonstration sites, and advisory services to strengthen long-term adoption and local innovation.
  • Monitor programme performance through indicators such as technology adoption, reductions in staking costs, improvements in bean productivity, reduced reliance on harvested wood, household income, and the participation of women and youth.

300 %

Increase in yields compared to bush beans

20,000—50,000 stakes per hectare

Staking density for highest yields

2 meters

Height of stakes for highest yields

⁓200,000 plants

Plant population per hectare

IP

Open source / open access

Scaling Readiness describes how complete a technology's development is and its ability to be scaled. It produces a score that measures a technology's readiness along two axes: the level of maturity of the idea itself, and the level to which the technology has been used so far.

Each axis goes from 0 to 9 where 9 is the “ready-to-scale” status. For each technology profile in the e-catalogs we have documented the scaling readiness status from evidence given by the technology providers. The e-catalogs only showcase technologies for which the scaling readiness score is at least 8 for maturity of the idea and 7 for the level of use.

The graph below represents visually the scaling readiness status for this technology, you can see the label of each level by hovering your mouse cursor on the number.

Read more about scaling readiness ›

Scaling readiness score of this technology

Maturity of the idea 8 out of 9

Uncontrolled environment: tested

Level of use 8 out of 9

Used by some intended users, in the real world

Maturity of the idea Level of use
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Project Countries Beneficiaries Budget (USD) & duration Key figures
ENSURE
Enabling Environments for Sustainable Regional Agriculture Extension
  • Kenya
  • Rwanda
  • Burundi
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • South Sudan
  • Uganda
  • Tanzania
  • Direct: 3,000,000    

13.14 million

2024–2027

  • 149,940 farmers trained
  • 9,996 Training
  • 2→3.5 tons/ha cereals production expected
  • 350 agent trained 

Figures in italic are from project plans and may change during implementation.

Countries with a green colour
Tested & adopted
Countries with a bright green colour
Adopted
Countries with a yellow colour
Tested
Countries with a blue colour
Testing ongoing
Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d’Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Republic of the Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
Countries where the technology is being tested or has been tested and adopted
Country Testing ongoing Tested Adopted
Benin –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Burundi –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Cameroon –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Central African Republic –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Côte d’Ivoire –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Democratic Republic of the Congo –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Ethiopia –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Ghana –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Kenya –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Malawi –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Mozambique –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Nigeria –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Rwanda –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
South Sudan –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Tanzania –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Uganda –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Zambia –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted

This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
Arid – – – –
Semiarid
Subhumid
Humid

Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

Sustainable Development Goal 1: no poverty
Goal 1: no poverty
Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
Goal 2: zero hunger
Sustainable Development Goal 8: decent work and economic growth
Goal 8: decent work and economic growth
Sustainable Development Goal 12: responsible production and consumption
Goal 12: responsible production and consumption

  • Best yields come from 2-meter-tall stakes.
  • Ideal stake density: 20,000 to 50,000 per hectare.
  • Recommended stake materials: Acacia, bamboo, or grasses like elephant grass.
  • Plant climbing beans in rows or hills with specific seed spacing.
  • Stakes should be at least 2 meters tall and have a rough surface for plant grip.
  • Single stakes can support 1 to 4 plants.
  • Tripod stakes can support 1 to 3 plants and can be connected for added strength.
  • Various materials like reeds, tree bark strips, or creeping plant stems can provide vertical support.

Last updated on Sep 21, 2026