Empowering Beans, Sustaining Growth!
The Low-Cost Staking practice offers innovative and affordable methods to address challenges in climbing bean cultivation, particularly the need for plant support. It focuses on reducing the use of wooden stakes by employing alternative materials and techniques such as tripod staking, wooden string trellises, and live plant support. These approaches aim to enhance yield while minimizing environmental damage caused by deforestation from excessive stake harvesting.
This technology is TAAT1 validated.
Adults 18 and over: Positive medium
The poor: Positive medium
Under 18: Positive low
Women: Positive medium
Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable
Farmer climate change readiness: Moderate improvement
Biodiversity: No impact on biodiversity
Carbon footprint: Much less carbon released
Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health
Soil quality: Does not affect soil health and fertility
Water use: A bit less water used
In the near future, this section will provide an overview of this technology's success in various contexts, details on partners offering technical support, training, and implementation monitoring, along with other valuable insights for your projects and programs. These details will be added progressively.
In the meantime, use the 'Request information' button if you need to contact us.
Increase in yields compared to bush beans
Staking density for highest yields
Height of stakes for highest yields
Plant population per hectare
Open source / open access
Country | Testing ongoing | Tested | Adopted |
---|---|---|---|
Benin | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Burundi | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Cameroon | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Central African Republic | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Côte d’Ivoire | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Ethiopia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Ghana | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Kenya | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Malawi | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Mozambique | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Nigeria | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Rwanda | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
South Sudan | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Tanzania | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Uganda | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Zambia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arid | – | – | – | – |
Semiarid | ||||
Subhumid | ||||
Humid |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
Last updated on 22 May 2024