Logo
TAAT e-catalog for Development partners
https://e-catalogs.taat-africa.org/org/technologies/biological-control-of-the-pod-borer-maruca-vitrata-with-exotic-parasitoids
Request information View pitch brochure

Biological control of the pod borer Maruca vitrata with exotic parasitoids

Low-cost natural pest control

The technology of "Biological control of the pod borer Maruca vitrata with exotic parasitoids" involves the strategic use of specific parasitic wasps as natural antagonists to manage and reduce the population of the destructive Maruca vitrata pod borer. These parasitoid wasps are sourced from the World Vegetable Center labs in Taiwan and are released in collaboration with national agencies in affected regions. The approach begins with the controlled rearing of parasitic wasps in laboratory settings, using live caterpillars of the pod borer as their hosts. Once these parasitoid wasps are ready, they are released either directly onto cowpea fields during the cropping season or on wild host plants during the off-season. After these releases, the parasitoids establish themselves in the environment, typically on wild vegetation. Over time, they naturally spread to cowpea fields, where the pod borer infestations occur. The key objective is to enable these parasitic wasps to reproduce, multiply, and effectively control the pod borer population. This biological control strategy is often coupled with the use of cowpea varieties that are resistant or tolerant to the pod borer and the application of eco-friendly products like neem or other compatible biopesticides. By utilizing this approach, the need for chemical pesticides is significantly reduced or eliminated. The ultimate goal of this technology is to create a self-sustaining population of parasitoid wasps that consistently and effectively reduce the damage caused by the Maruca vitrata pod borer to cowpea crops.

2

This technology is TAAT1 validated.

7•7

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 7/9; level of use 7/9

Adults 18 and over: Positive high

Farmers benefit directly from increased yields and reduced crop losses. The technology offers a “bonus” in terms of surplus yields without extra costs, leading to improved economic stability.

The poor: Positive high

This technology provides a cost-free, sustainable solution after the initial biocontrol agents are established, reducing the financial burden posed by purchase and use of chemical pesticides.

Under 18: No impact

Women: Positive medium

The biocontrol approach minimizes the need for labor-intensive pesticide applications, saving time that women can use for other household or economic activities.

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

It enhances resilience to climate variability, reducing dependence on chemical inputs, and is effective across diverse ecosystems.

Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement

Farmers can better manage climate-induced pest challenges with low-input, sustainable farming practices.

Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity

It preserves natural enemies and plant diversity, supporting ecosystem health.

Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released

Reduces emissions by minimizing pesticide use and fuel consumption for applications.

Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health

Improves ecosystems by reducing chemical pollution and supporting agroecological farming.

Soil quality: Does not affect soil health and fertility

Enhances soil health and fertility by reducing pesticide contamination.

Water use: Much less water used

This technology is water-efficient and does not place additional demands on water resources, making it suitable for use in water-scarce or drought-prone regions.

Problem

  • Extensive Damage to Cowpea by Pod Borer: The legume pod borer Maruca vitrata causes up to 80% yield loss in cowpea.
  • Over-reliance on Chemical Pesticides: Farmers frequently apply inappropriate formulations and dosage of chemical pesticides to manage cowpea pests, and this can induce the development of resistances in the pest organisms, and interfere with biological control methods.
  • Companion Pests: Other pests like aphids and thrips also impact cowpea production, requiring additional pest control solutions.
  • Sustainability of Pest Control: Lack of alternative host plants for parasitic wasps in Sahelian conditions during the dry season can limit their effectiveness.
  • Incompatibility with Chemical Pesticides: Chemical pesticides applied early in the season can kill biocontrol agents before they parasitize pod borers, reducing the effectiveness of the biocontrol strategy.

Solution

  • Biological Control with Parasitic Wasps: Recent advances involve the introduction of two specific parasitic wasps from the World Vegetable Center labs in Taiwan. These parasitic wasps target Maruca vitrata and have shown to reduce its population by over 85% in areas across Benin and Burkina Faso.

  • Collaboration and Release Strategy: National agencies collaborate to release parasitic wasps onto cowpea fields during the cropping season or on wild host plants during the off-season. This collaboration ensures widespread distribution of the biocontrol agents.

  • Reduced Reliance on Chemical Pesticides: By incorporating parasitic wasps, farmers can reduce their reliance on chemical pesticides, thus minimizing environmental impact and promoting sustainable pest management practices.

  • Integrated Pest Management (IPM): The approach integrates biological control with the use of resistant/tolerant cowpea varieties and the application of biopesticides like neem products to manage companion pests effectively.

  • Awareness and Sensitization: Farmers need to be educated about the benefits of biological control and the importance of avoiding chemical pesticides in areas where parasitic wasps have been released. Sensitization campaigns can also highlight the significance of preserving alternative host plants for the parasitic wasps and the environment.

Key points to design your program

This innovative technology addresses the persistent issue of Maruca vitrata, a major pest in cowpea farming, leading to significant yield losses across Africa. Through the introduction of exotic parasitoids such as Trichogramma chilonis and Telenomus remus, it provides an environmentally friendly solution to combat this pest, reducing reliance on chemical pesticides and enhancing cowpea productivity.

In Ghana and other West African countries, where cowpea is a vital crop for both food security and income generation, this technology has shown promising results. Farmers have seen increased yields and healthier crops, as the biological control agents effectively manage Maruca vitrata, reducing damage to pods and improving overall crop resilience.

The technology contributes to several Sustainable Development Goals. It supports SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) by enhancing food security, empowers women farmers (SDG 5) by improving yields and reducing labor, and promotes SDG 13 (Climate Action) by decreasing the reliance on chemical pesticides.

The biological control method enhances the economic prospects of farmers by improving yields and reducing input costs, which is especially crucial for smallholder farmers who depend on cowpea as a primary source of income. Its environmental benefits, such as reducing pesticide use, support long-term sustainability in farming systems.

As part of the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Toolkit, this technology works in synergy with other innovations, including pest-resistant cowpea varieties and better crop management practices, ensuring optimal results for farmers.

This biological control solution is ideal for development programs focused on increasing food security, improving farmer livelihoods, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices. Partnering with organizations like IITA and national agricultural research systems (NARS) ensures technical expertise and effective implementation.

5,000 USD

To install an initial pilot colony of parasitoids

6,000 USD

Running costs

IP

Open source / open access

Countries with a green colour
Tested & adopted
Countries with a bright green colour
Adopted
Countries with a yellow colour
Tested
Countries with a blue colour
Testing ongoing
Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d’Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Republic of the Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
Countries where the technology is being tested or has been tested and adopted
Country Testing ongoing Tested Adopted
Benin No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Burkina Faso No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Mali No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Niger No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Nigeria No ongoing testing Tested Adopted

This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
Arid
Semiarid
Subhumid
Humid

Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

Sustainable Development Goal 8: decent work and economic growth
Goal 8: decent work and economic growth

Increased productivity and sustainable job creation.

Sustainable Development Goal 12: responsible production and consumption
Goal 12: responsible production and consumption

Promotion of sustainable agricultural practices.

Sustainable Development Goal 13: climate action
Goal 13: climate action

Enhanced climate resilience and lower carbon emissions.

Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
Goal 2: zero hunger

Improved food security and nutrition through higher cowpea yields.

Sustainable Development Goal 1: no poverty
Goal 1: no poverty

Increased farmer incomes and economic stability for poor farmers.

Sustainable Development Goal 5: gender equality
Goal 5: gender equality

Empowerment of women farmers and reduced labor burdens.

  1. Controlled Rearing: The parasitic wasps are reared in laboratory settings, using live caterpillars of the pod borer as their hosts.
  2. Release Timing: Once the parasitoid wasps reach maturity, they are released either directly onto cowpea fields during the cropping season or on wild host plants during the off-season.
  3. Collaborative Release: These parasitoid wasps are released in collaboration with national plant protection and quarantine agencies in affected regions.
  4. Establishment and Spread: After release, the parasitoids establish themselves in the environment, primarily on wild vegetation. Over time, they naturally spread to cowpea fields, where pod borer infestations are prevalent.
  5. Reproduction and Multiplication: The key objective is to enable these parasitic wasps to reproduce and multiply, leading to effective control of the pod borer population.
  6. Complementary Strategies: This biological control strategy is often combined with the use of cowpea varieties that are resistant or tolerant to the pod borer and other cowpea pests, along with the application of eco-friendly products like neem or other compatible biopesticides.

Last updated on 11 December 2024