Logo
TAAT e-catalog for private sector
https://e-catalogs.taat-africa.org/com/technologies/short-term-fattening-and-supplemental-feeding
Request information View pitch brochure

Short-Term Fattening and Supplemental Feeding

Fast Feed, Fast Fatten, Fast Fortune: The Future of Livestock Farming!

The technology is an intensive feeding method implemented within feedlots to efficiently bring animals to slaughter weight with optimal fat deposits. These facilities are strategically located near livestock markets and slaughterhouses, aiming for three rounds of fattening per year. The timing is often synchronized with festive seasons, capitalizing on peak demand and market prices. This approach not only ensures rapid and profitable turnover but also aligns with market dynamics, making goat and sheep fattening a lucrative and market-responsive agricultural practice.

2

This technology is TAAT1 validated.

7•7

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 7/9; level of use 7/9

80 USD

cost of a young animal

50 %

70 USD

cost to finish a young animal in four months

IP

Open source / open access

Problem

  • Space Constraints: Livestock farming often requires extensive space, which may not be available for all farmers.
  • Risk Management: Livestock farming can be a risky venture, and farmers often seek methods that minimize these risks.
  • Time Constraints: Traditional livestock farming methods can take a long time to yield returns, which may not be suitable for farmers seeking quick results.
  • Acquisition of Suitable Animals: Finding and acquiring suitable young adult goats and sheep for fattening can be challenging.
  • Movement Restrictions: Implementing movement restrictions for intensive feeding in livestock can be difficult to manage.

Solution

  • Intensive Feedlot Farming: Utilizes less space by implementing intensive feeding methods within feedlots.
  • Rapid and Profitable Turnover: Minimizes risks by aiming for three rounds of fattening per year.
  • Quick Returns: Ensures returns within a short timeframe of three months.
  • Strategic Animal Selection: Recommends selecting animals of at least 20 kg in weight and avoiding older animals for fattening.
  • Effective Movement Restrictions: Provides solutions for implementing movement restrictions for intensive feeding.

Key points to design your business plan

Implementing the “Short-Term Fattening and Supplemental Feeding” technology in a business context involves key steps:

  • Initial Selection: Opt for healthy animals with large skeletal frames for maximum gain.
  • Castration: Consider this for males as it impacts fattening and meat quality.
  • Breed Selection: Choose breeds with quick growth potential and adaptability to fattening regimes.
  • Age and Weight Criteria: Select animals at least 20 kg in weight and avoid those beyond four years old.
  • Dietary Composition: Start with a diet including grass and hay, gradually reducing over two weeks.
  • Sorting and Group Rearing: Efficiently manage animals by sorting based on weight and gender, and rearing in groups.
  • Identification and Culling: Promptly cull animals not adjusting to intensive feeding.
  • Shelter Maintenance: Regular cleaning minimizes pest and disease threats.

The cost structure for implementing this technology can vary. For instance, fattening a young ram may cost about US $150, including the animal cost (around US $80) and fattening process cost (about US $70). Costs may encompass animal purchase, feed, necessary supplies, and operational costs like labor and transportation. These are general estimates; actual costs can vary based on project scale and local conditions.

These steps should be carefully planned and executed for successful implementation. The specific activities and their sequence may vary depending on the business context. A thorough feasibility study is always recommended before implementation.

Adults 18 and over: Positive high

The poor: Positive medium

Under 18: Positive low

Women: Positive medium

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement

Biodiversity: No impact on biodiversity

Carbon footprint: Same amount of carbon released

Environmental health: Moderately improves environmental health

Soil quality: Does not affect soil health and fertility

Water use: Same amount of water used

Countries with a green colour
Tested & adopted
Countries with a bright green colour
Adopted
Countries with a yellow colour
Tested
Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d’Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Republic of the Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
Countries where the technology has been tested and adopted
Country Tested Adopted
Burkina Faso Tested Adopted
Cameroon Tested Adopted
Ethiopia Tested Adopted
Kenya Tested Adopted
Niger Tested Adopted
Nigeria Tested Adopted
Somalia Tested Adopted
South Sudan Tested Adopted
Tanzania Tested Adopted
Uganda Tested Adopted

This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
Arid
Semiarid
Subhumid
Humid

Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
Goal 2: zero hunger
Sustainable Development Goal 8: decent work and economic growth
Goal 8: decent work and economic growth

  1. Critical Initial Selection: The technology begins with a crucial step of selecting healthy animals without physical defects, emphasizing those with large skeletal frames for greater potential gain.
  2. Castration Influence: For males, castration is highlighted as a practice that influences both fattening and the tastiness of meat.
  3. Breed Consideration: Certain breeds are identified as having better potential for growth and quicker adjustment to fattening regimes.
  4. Age and Weight Criteria: Animals beyond four years old are deemed unsuitable for fattening, and a minimum weight requirement of at least 20 kg is recommended.
  5. Dietary Composition: The first two weeks involve including grass and hay in the diet, with a gradual reduction over time.
  6. Sorting and Group Rearing: Where possible, sorting animals based on weight and gender is suggested, and raising them in groups for efficiency.
  7. Identification and Culling: Animals not adjusting to intensive feeding should be identified and culled promptly from the fattening stock.
  8. Feed Access Requirement: Each animal should have 15 to 20 linear centimeters of feed access.
  9. Shelter Maintenance: Shelters should be cleaned regularly to minimize the threats of pests and diseases.
  10. Animal Management Practices: All animals should be ear-tagged for identification, undergo deworming, and be weighed weekly for monitoring and management purposes.

Last updated on 22 May 2024