Safeguarding Chickens and reducing Costs
This technology is a special kind of chicken house that can be moved around. During the day, the chickens get to go outside and find their own food like bugs and plants. When it's time to sleep, they go back into the house where it's safe. What's great about this house is that it's not expensive to build, and it's easy to move. This is really helpful for small farmers who may not have a lot of money for fancy chicken houses. It also makes sure the chickens are happy and well looked after. The house is made from simple materials like wood, metal sheets for the roof, and mesh to keep the chickens safe. It's important to keep the house clean and fresh for the chickens' health. The design also makes sure the air inside is good for the chickens. Placing the house on flat ground and protecting it from predators is also key. All these things together make it a really helpful and practical solution for chicken farming.
This technology is TAAT1 validated.
Initial cost to raise 150 to 200 chickens
Benefit from selling birds
Weight of mature meat chickens in 6 weeks
floor space for 100 birds.
Open source / open access
The Low-Cost Cage and Free-Range Containment technology enables cost-effective and environmentally friendly poultry farming methods, empowering smallholder farmers for commercial production while promoting organic practices and conservation.
To estimate the project's scale, consider that approximately US $350 is enough to raise 150 to 200 chickens using a free-run system. The profitability of this technology is evident, as chickens costing US $3 each can typically be sold for US $4 to $5 each, yielding a 50% return on investment.
This technology is available across several countries including Zimbabwe, Zambia, Uganda, and Tanzania, among others. When planning, factor in potential duty fees for delivery. Access to this technology is facilitated through agricultural extension services, research institutions, local farming communities, and organizations dedicated to sustainable agriculture and rural development.
Additionally, explore integrating complementary technologies such as Biosecurity for Disease Prevention to improve operational efficiency.
Adults 18 and over: Positive high
The poor: Positive high
Under 18: Positive low
Women: Positive high
Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable
Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement
Environmental health: Moderately improves environmental health
Soil quality: Improves soil health and fertility
Water use: Same amount of water used
Country | Tested | Adopted |
---|---|---|
Benin | –Not tested | Adopted |
Botswana | –Not tested | Adopted |
Burundi | –Not tested | Adopted |
Central African Republic | –Not tested | Adopted |
Côte d’Ivoire | –Not tested | Adopted |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | –Not tested | Adopted |
Ethiopia | –Not tested | Adopted |
Gabon | –Not tested | Adopted |
Ghana | –Not tested | Adopted |
Guinea | –Not tested | Adopted |
Kenya | –Not tested | Adopted |
Madagascar | –Not tested | Adopted |
Malawi | –Not tested | Adopted |
Mozambique | –Not tested | Adopted |
Niger | –Not tested | Adopted |
Nigeria | –Not tested | Adopted |
Rwanda | –Not tested | Adopted |
Senegal | –Not tested | Adopted |
Sierra Leone | –Not tested | Adopted |
Somalia | –Not tested | Adopted |
South Sudan | –Not tested | Adopted |
Tanzania | –Not tested | Adopted |
Uganda | –Not tested | Adopted |
Zambia | –Not tested | Adopted |
Zimbabwe | –Not tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arid | ||||
Semiarid | ||||
Subhumid | ||||
Humid |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
Last updated on 22 May 2024