Logo
TAAT e-catalog for Development partners
https://e-catalogs.taat-africa.org/org/technologies/affordable-fish-feed-production-formulation-and-pelleting-of-low-cost-feeds
Request information View pitch brochure

Affordable Fish Feed Production: Formulation and Pelleting of Low-Cost Feeds

Empowering Aquaculture with Affordable Feeds

Formulation and Pelleting of Low-Cost Feeds" is a critical aquaculture technology that aims to reduce the high cost of fish feeds in Sub-Saharan Africa. Fish farming operations often allocate a significant portion of their budget, around 60% to 70%, for imported or overseas blended feed ingredients. This technology facilitates the local production of affordable, nutritionally balanced fish feeds. By leveraging extrusion and pelleting techniques, it enhances feed stability, nutrient delivery, and ease of handling. This innovation has the potential to significantly boost the profitability and sustainability of fish farming businesses in the region.

2

This technology is TAAT1 validated.

8•8

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 8/9; level of use 8/9

Project adoption1

Technology integrated in the PROMAC project.
Project Countries Beneficiaries Budget (USD) & duration Key figures
PROMAC
Projet de Promotion de l’Aquaculture Durable et de Compétitivité des Chaines de Valeur de la Pêche
  • Benin
  • Direct: 10550                                                                                           
  • Indirect: 1200000

102.86 million

2023–2028

  • 250 ha constructed ponds
  • 56,000 m³ of equipped cages and pens
  • 90 million fingerlings planned each year
  • 6,300 direct jobs in aquaculture 

Figures in italic are from project plans and may change during implementation.

See project details ›

Adults 18 and over: Positive high

The poor: Positive high

Under 18: Positive medium

Women: Positive low

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement

Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity

Carbon footprint: Same amount of carbon released

Environmental health: Moderately improves environmental health

Soil quality: Does not affect soil health and fertility

Water use: Same amount of water used

Problem

  • High feed costs: Expensive feed is a major constraint to profitable and sustainable aquaculture production.
  • Limited access to affordable feed: Small and medium scale fish farmers may have difficulty accessing nutritionally balanced feed at affordable prices.
  • Dependence on imported ingredients: Reliance on imported feed ingredients can increase production costs and constrain local feed supply.
  • Poor nutrient transfer: Simple or unprocessed ingredients may have low water stability, reducing the efficiency of nutrient delivery to fish.
  • Feed waste and pollution: Poorly stable feed can increase waste and contribute to pollution in aquaculture ponds.
  • Limited local feed production capacity: Insufficient capacity to formulate and pellet locally available ingredients can limit the development of affordable fish feed supply systems.

Solution

  • Affordable feed production: The technology enables local production of nutritionally balanced fish feeds using locally available crop and animal products.
  • Reduced dependence on imported inputs: Ingredient selection based on local availability, price, and nutritional quality can strengthen local feed supply.
  • Improved feed efficiency: Extrusion and pelleting improve water stability and nutrient transfer to farmed fish.
  • Reduced waste and pollution: More stable pellets reduce feed losses and help limit pollution in aquaculture ponds.
  • Improved storage and distribution: Pelleted feed is easier to package, store, transport, and distribute to fish farmers.
  • Adaptable feed production: Formulations can be customized according to fish species and growth stages, allowing feed production to respond to different aquaculture requirements.

Key points to design your program

Affordable Fish Feed Production strengthens aquaculture value chains by improving the availability, affordability, and quality of fish feed produced from locally available ingredients. The technology addresses one of the major constraints to profitable aquaculture by reducing feed costs, improving feed quality, and strengthening local feed supply systems. By replacing imported feed ingredients with locally formulated and pelleted feeds, it improves feed efficiency, reduces production costs, and supports more sustainable aquaculture production. The technology is well suited for food security, aquaculture development, agribusiness, and blue economy programmes, contributing to SDGs 1 (No Poverty), 2 (Zero Hunger), 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 13 (Climate Action). It also creates business opportunities for women and youth through feed manufacturing, distribution, and aquaculture service enterprises. To successfully integrate this technology, consider the following key actions:

  • Identify priority aquaculture hubs where feed availability, affordability, and quality constrain fish production, while assessing local market demand and the availability of suitable crop and animal feed ingredients.
  • Establish partnerships with WorldFish, research institutions, extension services, feed manufacturers, aquaculture cooperatives, and private-sector partners to support feed formulation, quality assurance, and technology dissemination.
  • Invest in local feed production facilities, including feed-processing equipment, extrusion and pelleting systems, storage facilities, and quality control infrastructure adapted to local production needs.
  • Strengthen local supply chains by supporting the sourcing, aggregation, storage, and processing of locally available feed ingredients to improve feed availability and reduce dependence on imported feeds.
  • Train feed manufacturers, entrepreneurs, cooperatives, extension agents, and women and youth groups on feed formulation, species-specific feed production, equipment operation, quality assurance, and business management.
  • Promote the production of floating pellets for surface-feeding species and sinking pellets for bottom-feeding species, while integrating locally produced feeds with improved fish strains and good aquaculture management practices.
  • Strengthen quality assurance and certification systems to ensure locally manufactured feeds comply with national nutritional standards and provide consistent product quality.
  • Monitor programme performance through indicators such as local feed production, feed quality, feed availability, enterprise profitability, fish productivity, and the participation of women and youth.

85,000 USD

Equipment of production

Scaling Readiness describes how complete a technology's development is and its ability to be scaled. It produces a score that measures a technology's readiness along two axes: the level of maturity of the idea itself, and the level to which the technology has been used so far.

Each axis goes from 0 to 9 where 9 is the “ready-to-scale” status. For each technology profile in the e-catalogs we have documented the scaling readiness status from evidence given by the technology providers. The e-catalogs only showcase technologies for which the scaling readiness score is at least 8 for maturity of the idea and 7 for the level of use.

The graph below represents visually the scaling readiness status for this technology, you can see the label of each level by hovering your mouse cursor on the number.

Read more about scaling readiness ›

Scaling readiness score of this technology

Maturity of the idea 8 out of 9

Uncontrolled environment: tested

Level of use 8 out of 9

Used by some intended users, in the real world

Maturity of the idea Level of use
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Project Countries Beneficiaries Budget (USD) & duration Key figures
PROMAC
Projet de Promotion de l’Aquaculture Durable et de Compétitivité des Chaines de Valeur de la Pêche
  • Benin
  • Direct: 10550                                                                                           
  • Indirect: 1200000

102.86 million

2023–2028

  • 250 ha constructed ponds
  • 56,000 m³ of equipped cages and pens
  • 90 million fingerlings planned each year
  • 6,300 direct jobs in aquaculture 

Figures in italic are from project plans and may change during implementation.

Countries with a green colour
Tested & adopted
Countries with a bright green colour
Adopted
Countries with a yellow colour
Tested
Countries with a blue colour
Testing ongoing
Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso The Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d'Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan The Republic of the Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania, United Republic Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
Countries where the technology is being tested or has been tested and adopted
Country Testing ongoing Tested Adopted
Benin –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Botswana –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Cameroon –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Congo –No ongoing testing –Not tested Adopted
Côte d'Ivoire –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Djibouti –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Equatorial Guinea –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Ethiopia –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Kenya –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Liberia –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Madagascar –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Malawi –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Mozambique –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Nigeria –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Rwanda –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Senegal –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Sierra Leone –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
South Sudan –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Tanzania, United Republic –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
The Democratic Republic of the Congo –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
The Republic of the Sudan –No ongoing testing –Not tested Adopted
Uganda –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Zambia –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Zimbabwe –No ongoing testing Tested Adopted

This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
Arid
Semiarid
Subhumid
Humid

Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
Goal 2: zero hunger

  1. Source Quality Ingredients: Ensure that locally sourced feed ingredients are of high quality and competitively priced, taking into account toxin levels and substances affecting palatability and water stability in feed formulation.

  2. Grinding Raw Materials: Use a hammer mill to grind the raw materials into a fine powder. Smaller particle sizes are preferable as they enhance digestibility, cohesiveness, and water stability. Sun or oven dry the materials before grinding, and ensure uniform particle size for different ingredients.

  3. Mixing Ingredients: Homogenize the ingredients by mixing them manually to create a mash, or for large-scale feed production, use a mechanical mixer.

  4. Adding Binders (if needed): If the cereals in the formula do not provide adequate binding, consider adding cassava starch or a similar product as a binder.

  5. Moistening Raw Materials: Just before extrusion, moisten the raw materials to ensure they adhere together.

  6. Wet Extrusion: Use wet-type steam pelletizers for extrusion, which helps gelatinize starch, further improving the nutritional value of the feed.

  7. Pellet Size: Ensure that the diameter of the pellets is at least 4 millimeters, suitable for most adult fish.

Last updated on Oct 1, 2026