Bringing farmers, vets, and institutions together to scale livestock vaccination!
Innovation Platforms (IPs) are coordination mechanisms that support government-led livestock vaccination programs by bringing together public veterinary services, local authorities, private veterinarians, vaccine suppliers, and farmer organizations. They strengthen planning, implementation, and monitoring of vaccination campaigns at local level. By improving communication, trust, and data on livestock populations, IPs help increase vaccination coverage, improve disease surveillance and control, and strengthen the performance and accountability of public animal health services.
This technology is pre-validated.
|
Target Groups |
Positive Impacts |
|
Women in informal livestock market activities |
· Improved access to vaccination information and services. · Greater voice in local decision-making through IP participation and stronger links to financial services and input suppliers. · Better integration into local disease control efforts. · Improved awareness of animal health risks and biosecurity, reducing disease transmission along market chains. |
|
Youth and young livestock entrepreneurs in remote and hard-to-reach communities |
· Better access to networks and market opportunities. · Improved skills through participation in coordination platforms. · Reduced travel time and costs to access services. · Improved disease prevention in underserved areas. |
|
Pastoralists and transhumant herders from low-income and resource-constrained households |
· Improved access to vaccination points along transhumance routes. · Stronger communication between mobile herders and veterinary services. · Reduced disease risks in mobile herds. · Reduced indirect costs (travel, missed work). · Better information on vaccination benefits and improved livestock survival and productivity, supporting household food security and income. |
Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable
strengthen resilience to climate change through improvement of herd productivity resulting in increased farmer incomes and nutrition.
Farmer climate change readiness: Moderate improvement
healthy animals emit less greenhouse gas
Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity
health animals will provide essential services such as pollination, and soil productivity, which are crucial for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem health.
Carbon footprint: Much less carbon released
healthy animals emit less greenhouse gas
Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health
health animals make less waste and less spread of disease through the environment
Soil quality: Does not affect soil health and fertility
healthy animals will adopt optimum grazing which enhance soil health by recycling nutrients, enriching the soil, and providing ecosystem services such as soil stabilization and carbon sequestration.
Water use: Same amount of water used
health animals pollute water less and contribute to quality of water accessible to them for their health, growth rates, and overall productivity.
To integrate Innovation Platforms (IPs) into public livestock vaccination programs and local service delivery systems, governments need both basic system readiness and simple operational steps.
Open source / open access
Scaling Readiness describes how complete a technology’s development is and its ability to be scaled. It produces a score that measures a technology’s readiness along two axes: the level of maturity of the idea itself, and the level to which the technology has been used so far.
Each axis goes from 0 to 9 where 9 is the “ready-to-scale” status. For each technology profile in the e-catalogs we have documented the scaling readiness status from evidence given by the technology providers. The e-catalogs only showcase technologies for which the scaling readiness score is at least 8 for maturity of the idea and 7 for the level of use.
The graph below represents visually the scaling readiness status for this technology, you can see the label of each level by hovering your mouse cursor on the number.
Read more about scaling readiness ›
Uncontrolled environment: validated
Used by some intended users, in the real world
| Maturity of the idea | Level of use | |||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||
|
Target Groups |
Positive Impacts |
|
Women in informal livestock market activities |
· Improved access to vaccination information and services. · Greater voice in local decision-making through IP participation and stronger links to financial services and input suppliers. · Better integration into local disease control efforts. · Improved awareness of animal health risks and biosecurity, reducing disease transmission along market chains. |
|
Youth and young livestock entrepreneurs in remote and hard-to-reach communities |
· Better access to networks and market opportunities. · Improved skills through participation in coordination platforms. · Reduced travel time and costs to access services. · Improved disease prevention in underserved areas. |
|
Pastoralists and transhumant herders from low-income and resource-constrained households |
· Improved access to vaccination points along transhumance routes. · Stronger communication between mobile herders and veterinary services. · Reduced disease risks in mobile herds. · Reduced indirect costs (travel, missed work). · Better information on vaccination benefits and improved livestock survival and productivity, supporting household food security and income. |
|
Target Groups |
Unintended Impacts |
Mitigation Measures |
|
Women in informal livestock market activities |
· Increased time burden from meetings and coordination roles; · Risk of token participation without real influence; · Potential backlash or restrictions from household or market power dynamics. |
· Schedule meetings at convenient times and locations; · Ensure women hold meaningful leadership roles with decision power; · Engage male leaders and market authorities to support women’s participation; · Provide safe spaces for women’s voices (e.g., women-only pre-meetings). |
|
Youth and young livestock entrepreneurs in remote and hard-to-reach communities |
· Risk of being used mainly as unpaid mobilizers; · Frustration if promised business opportunities do not materialize; · Exclusion from decisions due to age hierarchies. |
· Define clear roles and fair incentives for youth participation; · Link IP engagement to concrete opportunities (training, service contracts, pilots); · Include youth representatives in IP leadership; · Provide mentorship and visibility for youth contributions. |
|
Pastoralists and transhumant herders from low-income and resource-constrained households |
· Continued exclusion if IPs remain sedentary and meeting-based; · Vaccination schedules still misaligned with mobility patterns; |
· Adapt participation methods (mobile coordination, representation through pastoralist leaders); · Align vaccination points with transhumance routes and market days; · Ensure balanced representation in IP governance; frame IPs as service coordination platforms, not enforcement bodies; · Use trusted intermediaries for engagement. |
|
Target Groups |
Barriers to adoption |
Mitigation Measures |
|
Women in informal livestock market activities |
· Limited time due to care and market work; · Low representation in decision-making spaces; · Limited access to finance and formal networks; · Low access to information on vaccination schedules and benefits. |
· Schedule IP meetings at convenient times and locations; · Set minimum targets for women’s representation in IP leadership; · use women’s groups and market associations for outreach; · link women to microfinance and input suppliers; tailor communication channels (local radio, peer educators). |
|
Youth and young livestock entrepreneurs in remote and hard-to-reach communities |
· Limited capital and assets to engage in service delivery; · Weak networks and low credibility with established actors; · High costs of accessing markets and services due to distance; · Limited technical skills. |
· Provide entry points for youth in IP roles (mobilization, logistics, service support); · Link youth to training, mentorship, and starter finance; · Use IPs to connect youth to markets and service contracts; · Support mobile or digital outreach to reduce distance barriers. |
|
Pastoralists and transhumant herders from low-income and resource-constrained households |
· Mobility makes it hard to attend fixed meetings and vaccination points; · Vaccination schedules not aligned with migration routes; · Low trust in formal services due to past exclusion. |
· Adapt IP participation mechanisms (mobile representatives, coordination across communes); · Align vaccination schedules with transhumance calendars; · Establish vaccination points along routes and markets; explore targeted subsidies or flexible payment options; · Use trusted intermediaries (pastoralist leaders, herder associations) for engagement. |
| Country | Testing ongoing | Tested | Adopted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mali | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
| AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arid | ||||
| Semiarid | ||||
| Subhumid | ||||
| Humid |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
Improves livestock health and productivity through higher vaccination coverage, increasing the availability of animal-source foods and strengthening food security.
Strengthens animal health service delivery and disease prevention systems, reducing the burden of endemic livestock diseases.
Increases women’s participation in vaccination programs and local decision-making, improving their access to animal health services and economic opportunities.
Builds effective public–private–community partnerships to plan and deliver livestock vaccination at scale.
Step 1 – Select the territory (commune)
Choose a commune (urban or rural) as the coordination unit, covering several villages.
Step 2 – Map key actors
Identify all actors in the livestock vaccination system:
farmers, private veterinarians, vaccine suppliers, public veterinary services, traders, processors, financial institutions, NGOs, community leaders.
Step 3 – Organize a 2-day setup workshop
Hold a 2-day workshop in each commune to:
Step 4 – Form the IP steering committee
Elect a small leadership team: coordinator, secretary, treasurer, communication lead.
Ensure women are represented (at least two leadership positions).
Step 5 – Train IP leaders and facilitators
Train steering committee members on governance, leadership, and coordination.
Train local facilitators to run meetings and support dialogue between actors.
Step 6 – Plan joint actions
Develop a simple work plan for vaccination campaigns:
roles, timelines, community mobilization, logistics, and follow-up.
Step 7 – Hold regular coordination meetings
Meet regularly (about once per month) to:
review progress, solve problems, and adjust plans.
Step 8 – Build capacities continuously
Provide ongoing training to IP members on:
vaccination planning, community engagement, data collection, and coordination.
Step 9 – Monitor and document results
Record meetings, activities, and vaccination outcomes.
Collect basic data on participation and coverage.
Step 10 – Review and improve annually
Hold an annual planning and review workshop with all actors to:
share results, identify gaps, and update the action plan for the next year.
Last updated on 11 March 2026