Logo
TAAT e-catalog for government
https://e-catalogs.taat-africa.org/gov/technologies/cassqual-cassava-seed-quality-management-system
Request information View pitch brochure

CassQual: Cassava Seed Quality Management system

Enhancing cassava productivity through healthy planting material

The system operates under national seed regulations, combining inspection protocols, phytosanitary measures, and digital platforms. It enables quality assurance from breeder-level seed to farmer-level distribution. National regulators define standards and oversee compliance through certification inspections, while also promoting community-based quality-declared seed (QDS) systems. Tools like Seed Tracker and PlantVillage Nuru support efficient field registration, inspection recording, and disease identification.

This technology is pre-validated.

9•9

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 9/9; level of use 9/9

The poor: Positive high

The technology is strongly beneficial for the poor, for whom cassava is a key source of food and income

Women: No impact

The technology is gender neutral

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

Cassava is known to be one of the most climate resilient crops

Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement

Boosting cassava productivity is an excellent way to adapt to potential climate change impacts and cassava is less likely to be negatively impacted than other crops

Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released

Greater land productivity can enhance land use efficiency which prevents increases in carbon emissions

Biodiversity: Not verified

Not verified

Environmental health: Not verified

Not verified

Soil quality: Not yet estimated

Not yet estimated

Problem

  • Spread of cassava viral diseases: Infected planting materials can contribute to the spread of CMD and CBSD, creating challenges for national cassava production and phytosanitary management.

  • Inadequate certification frameworks: Existing seed regulations may not provide sufficiently developed procedures for certifying cassava planting materials.

  • Weak regulatory oversight: Limited inspection capacity and inconsistent quality control can make it difficult to verify the health and quality of planting materials at different stages of the seed system.

  • Insufficient digital monitoring: Paper-based or fragmented records can limit the tracking of seed production, field inspections, certification, and distribution.

  • Limited access to certified seed: Weak formal seed systems can leave farmers dependent on informal sources with uncertain varietal identity and phytosanitary status.

  • Barriers to inclusive seed-sector development: Small-scale and community-based seed producers may lack clear pathways, training, or institutional support to participate in regulated seed production.

Solution

  • Cassava-specific certification frameworks: Governments can develop or adapt national seed certification guidelines to address the particular requirements of cassava planting materials.

  • Institutionalized inspection and quality control: National regulatory agencies can oversee seed inspections and enforce standards throughout the seed production chain.

  • Digital regulatory monitoring: Tools such as Seed Tracker can support seed field registration, inspection records, certification management, and traceability.

  • Community-based QDS systems: Governments can establish or strengthen quality-declared seed approaches to broaden participation in quality seed production and improve access at local level.

  • Certification labeling: Electronic or other suitable certification labels can help identify seed categories and communicate certification status to farmers and buyers.

  • Policy and institutional strengthening: Governments can update seed policies, train inspection officers, and coordinate stakeholders to establish a functional and inclusive cassava seed quality management system.

Key points to design your project

The Cassava Seed Quality Management System offers a structured approach to ensuring the availability of clean, certified planting material, thereby improving national cassava productivity, promoting gender inclusion, and supporting climate resilience. It aligns with key national priorities and contributes directly to SDGs 1 and 2.

To effectively integrate this system into national agricultural programs, the following steps are recommended:

  1. Understand the system’s framework, including seed classification, certification procedures, and regulatory roles.
  2. Assess existing national seed policies and identify opportunities to incorporate cassava into the formal certification system.
  3. Develop or adapt certification guidelines, using tested models (e.g., Nigeria or Tanzania), in consultation with seed regulatory bodies.
  4. Engage local stakeholders through consultative workshops to ensure relevance and ownership at the community level.
  5. Strengthen capacity by training seed inspectors and seed companies on certification standards and phytosanitary practices.
  6. Establish demonstration plots to showcase the benefits of certified seed and encourage farmer adoption.
  7. Leverage digital tools such as Seed Tracker™ for field registration and certification tracking, and PlantVillage Nuru for disease diagnostics.
  8. Implement monitoring mechanisms to track progress, ensure compliance, and support continuous improvement.

This approach not only strengthens seed system governance but also positions cassava as a reliable, high-performing value chain within national agricultural transformation agendas.

60,000 USD

Annual monitoring cost

25,000 USD

Annual certification costs

135 %

Yield increased

IP

Open source / open access

Scaling Readiness describes how complete a technology's development is and its ability to be scaled. It produces a score that measures a technology's readiness along two axes: the level of maturity of the idea itself, and the level to which the technology has been used so far.

Each axis goes from 0 to 9 where 9 is the “ready-to-scale” status. For each technology profile in the e-catalogs we have documented the scaling readiness status from evidence given by the technology providers. The e-catalogs only showcase technologies for which the scaling readiness score is at least 8 for maturity of the idea and 7 for the level of use.

The graph below represents visually the scaling readiness status for this technology, you can see the label of each level by hovering your mouse cursor on the number.

Read more about scaling readiness ›

Scaling readiness score of this technology

Maturity of the idea 9 out of 9

Uncontrolled environment: validated

Level of use 9 out of 9

Common use by intended users, in the real world

Maturity of the idea Level of use
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Countries with a green colour
Tested & adopted
Countries with a bright green colour
Adopted
Countries with a yellow colour
Tested
Countries with a blue colour
Testing ongoing
Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso The Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d'Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan The Republic of the Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania, United Republic Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
Countries where the technology is being tested or has been tested and adopted
Country Testing ongoing Tested Adopted
Nigeria –No ongoing testing –Not tested Adopted
Tanzania, United Republic –No ongoing testing –Not tested Adopted

This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
Arid – – – –
Semiarid – – – –
Subhumid –
Humid –

Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

Sustainable Development Goal 1: no poverty
Goal 1: no poverty

Its contributes to poverty reduction

Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
Goal 2: zero hunger

Its contributes to reducing hunger

1.  Baseline Assessment: Evaluate the current cassava seed system to determine:

    • Availability of registered, market-preferred, and disease-resistant varieties.
    • Capacity of the regulatory agency.
    • Existence of cassava certification guidelines.
    • Prevalence and impact of CMD and CBSD.
    • Adaptability of existing e-certification systems for cassava.​

2.  Design/Modification of Certification Guidelines: Develop or adapt certification guidelines using successful models:

    • In West Africa (where CBSD is absent), Nigeria's guidelines serve as a suitable model.
    • In East, Central, and Southern Africa (where CBSD is present), Tanzania's guidelines are effective.​

3. Update National Seed Policy: If cassava certification is new, collaborate with stakeholders to validate guidelines and incorporate them into national seed regulations.​

4. Train Seed Inspection Officers: Provide training on cassava field certification procedures, including disease recognition (CMD and CBSD), and develop strategies to train community-level or QDS producers in self-certification.​

5. Certification Labelling: Design electronic labels for each cassava seed category and distribute them to seed producers post successful certification inspections.​

6. Digital Monitoring: Implement or adapt digital systems (e.g., Seed Tracker™) for managing cassava seed field registration and certification.​

7. Roll Out: Launch the certification system, starting with higher seed classes. Gather user feedback and invest in the system through strategic support, similar to other major staples like maize.​

Last updated on Oct 20, 2026