Logo
TAAT e-catalog for government
https://e-catalogs.taat-africa.org/gov/technologies/biological-control-of-sorghum-and-millet-insect-pests-with-natural-enemies
Request information View pitch brochure

Biological Control of Sorghum and Millet Insect Pests with Natural Enemies

Protect crops using natural pest allies for sustainable pest control in Africa

Biological control of insect pests with natural enemies is applied in the field where the pests pose a threat. The natural enemies are released into these areas, where they naturally control the pest population by preying on them or parasitizing them. This method is particularly effective against pests like the Millet Head Miner and the Fall Armyworm. The use of this technology not only helps in reducing crop losses but also contributes to healthier ecosystems and improved food security. It’s a practical and environmentally sound solution to pest-related challenges in agriculture.

2

This technology is TAAT1 validated.

7•7

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 7/9; level of use 7/9

Adults 18 and over: Positive high

With this technology, farmers can experience higher crop yields, leading to increased income and improved food security for their families.

The poor: Positive low

By reducing crop losses and improving yields through effective pest management, families can increase their food security and income.

Under 18: Positive low

This technology provides youth with valuable skills and potential employment opportunities in agriculture and pest management.

Women: Positive medium

Increased involvement in sustainable practices can enhance women economic contributions and leadership roles within communities.

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

This approach encourages crop diversity and rotation, which can enhance resilience against climate impacts.

Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement

By reducing reliance on chemical pesticides and promoting the use of natural predators, farmers can create more resilient agricultural systems that adapt better to changing climatic conditions.

Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity

Promoting natural enemies helps maintain biodiversity within the agricultural ecosystem. A diverse ecosystem can better withstand pests and diseases, supporting more sustainable farming

Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released

Lowering the use of synthetic pesticides can reduce the carbon footprint associated with their production, transportation, and application.

Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health

Using biological control methods can reduce chemical residues in food, promoting safer agricultural practices.

Soil quality: Improves soil health and fertility

A diverse ecosystem supports better nutrient cycling, leading to healthier soils that can sustain crop growth over time.

Water use: A bit less water used

Healthier soils retain moisture better, reducing the need for irrigation and conserving water resources, which is crucial in areas prone to drought.

Problem

  • Pest Infestations and Food Security: Pests like the Millet Head Miner and Fall Armyworm often infest crops in Sub-Saharan Africa, leading to significant crop losses. This not only impacts the livelihoods of farmers but also poses a threat to the region’s food security.
  • Overuse of Chemical Pesticides and Ecosystem Health: The frequent use of chemical pesticides to control pests can lead to environmental pollution and harm non-target species, disrupting ecosystems. Additionally, these chemicals pose health risks for farmers and consumers, and pests may develop resistance over time.
  • Lack of Accessibility: Many farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa lack access to effective pest management solutions. They may not have the resources or knowledge to use chemical pesticides safely and effectively, leaving them vulnerable to pest infestations and the associated crop losses.

Solution

  • Parasitoid Wasp Predation: Introduction of the parasitoid wasp Habrobracon hebetor, which targets the caterpillar of the millet head miner.
  • Caterpillar Control with Parasitoid Wasp: Utilization of the parasitoid wasp Habrobracon hebetor, which attacks the caterpillar, preventing further damage to the seeds.
  • Preventing Severe Infestations: Implementation of biological control techniques, such as releasing natural enemies, to prevent severe infestations and reduce crop losses.
  • Stable Food Supply Assurance: By controlling the millet head miner population, this approach ensures a more stable and sufficient food supply, even in years with variable rainfall.
  • Fall Armyworm Parasitization: Recent work shows that the parasitoid wasp Telenomus remus is a promising biocontrol organism to prevent outbreaks of the Fall Armyworm as it parasitizes the eggs of the pest.

Key points to design your project

Biological control mitigates climate change by reducing chemical pesticide use, and supports biodiversity. It aligns with SDGs 2 (Zero Hunger), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 15 (Life on Land).

To integrate biological control into a project, follow these steps:

  1. Risk Assessment: Determine critical levels of the insect pest and its natural enemies when risks of outbreaks and crop damage occur. This helps in understanding the severity and timing of potential infestations.

  2. Monitoring Protocols: Establish monitoring protocols and schemes that guide the planning of parasitoid rearing and release. Regular monitoring can help in timely intervention and effective pest management.

  3. Awareness Campaigns: Run awareness campaigns about the advantages of biological pest control over the short- and long-term. This can help in gaining community support and acceptance for the project.

  4. Training Programs: Train extension agents and farmers about mass-rearing and augmentative release techniques. This empowers them with the knowledge and skills to implement biological control effectively.

  5. Resource Organization: Organize supply of low-cost materials, substrates and mated females for starter colonies. This ensures the availability of necessary resources for the project.

  6. Evaluation and Feedback: Implement a system for regular evaluation of the project’s effectiveness and feedback from the farmers. This can help in continuous improvement and adaptation of the project as per the local needs and conditions.

  7. Partnerships: Establish partnerships with local communities, agricultural organizations, research institutions, and other stakeholders. These partnerships can provide technical expertise, resources, and local knowledge, contributing to the successful implementation of the project.

  8. Cost Estimation and Funding: Conduct a detailed cost estimation for the project, including costs for rearing and releasing parasitoids, training programs, monitoring, and other operational expenses. Secure funding through government grants, partnerships, or other sources to cover these costs. It’s also important to consider the cost-effectiveness of the project in the long run, as biological control can lead to significant savings by reducing the need for chemical pesticides and preventing crop losses.

Cost: $$$ 5,000 USD

establishment of parasitoïd colonies for 10,000 farmers

6,000 USD

per year for operation

3—4 USD

per "ready-to-use" bag

IP

Open source / open access

Countries with a green colour
Tested & adopted
Countries with a bright green colour
Adopted
Countries with a yellow colour
Tested
Countries with a blue colour
Testing ongoing
Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d’Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Republic of the Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
Countries where the technology is being tested or has been tested and adopted
Country Testing ongoing Tested Adopted
Niger No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Nigeria No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Senegal No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Zimbabwe No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted

This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
Arid
Semiarid
Subhumid
Humid

Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
Goal 2: zero hunger

Effective pest management helps increase food production, thereby improving food security and reducing hunger in vulnerable communities.

Sustainable Development Goal 12: responsible production and consumption
Goal 12: responsible production and consumption

Promoting biological control aligns with sustainable agriculture practices that minimize chemical inputs and encourage responsible resource use.

Sustainable Development Goal 3: good health and well-being
Goal 3: good health and well-being

Utilizing biological control reduces reliance on chemical pesticides, lowering health risks associated with pesticide exposure for farmers and consumers.

Sustainable Development Goal 13: climate action
Goal 13: climate action

Biological control methods enhance resilience to climate change impacts by promoting sustainable farming practices that adapt to environmental changes.

Sustainable Development Goal 15: life on land
Goal 15: life on land

By using natural predators, farmers help preserve and promote biodiversity in agricultural landscapes, contributing to ecosystem health.

  • Monitoring Pest and Natural Enemy Populations: Begin by monitoring the population levels of both the harmful insect pests (such as the Millet Head Miner and Fall Armyworm) and their natural enemies in your fields. This can be done using simple tools like traps and magnifying glasses, or more advanced methods like high-resolution cameras fitted onto drones for rapid surveillance of larger areas.

  • Rearing Parasitoid Wasps (Habrobracon hebetor): If the population of natural enemies becomes too low, it's essential to increase their numbers through rearing techniques. This can be achieved using a jute bag filled with 50 grams of millet grains, 30 grams of millet grain flour, and 25 larvae of the rice moth, along with two mated female parasitoid wasps. In about 8 days, these biocontrol agents will reach the adult stage. On average, one jute bag yields around 70 parasitoids in 10 days.

  • Release of Parasitoid Wasps (Habrobracon hebetor): Three jute bags containing the parasitoid wasps should be placed in the field, with one bag in the middle and the others at both ends, at the beginning of the heading stage of millet. This strategic placement ensures effective coverage.

  • Rearing Telenomus remus (for Fall Armyworm Control): For controlling Fall Armyworm, collect sorghum leaves that are infested by the eggs of the pest. Expose these leaves to a mated female wasp in plastic flasks for 2 days, using a ratio of 20 eggs to 1 wasp. The female T. remus produces approximately 200 adults.

  • Release of Telenomus remus (for Fall Armyworm Control): Release T. remus on farms from the windward side of the field. This ensures they are well-positioned to target and parasitize the eggs of the Fall Armyworm.

Last updated on 2 October 2024