Logo
TAAT e-catalog for government
https://e-catalogs.taat-africa.org/gov/technologies/biological-control-of-mango-mealybug
Request information View pitch brochure

Biological control of mango mealybug

Natural Allies for Mango Mealybug Control

This technology is a biological control method using two specific parasitoid species, Gyranusoidea tebygi and Anagyrus mangicola, imported from India. These tiny wasps target the invasive mango mealybug by locating and parasitizing it—laying their eggs inside the pest. As the parasitoid larvae develop, they consume the host, ultimately leading to its death. This targeted attack significantly reduces the mealybug population, with field releases in West and Central Africa achieving reductions of about 95%. The method has proven highly effective, offering a sustainable and economically beneficial alternative to chemical pesticides for protecting mango crops.

2

This technology is pre-validated.

9•7

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 9/9; level of use 7/9

Adults 18 and over: Positive high

Adult farmers, especially those engaged in mango production, benefit from increased yields and reduced crop loss. This improves household income and food security.

The poor: Positive high

Poor farming households benefit from a free, sustainable pest control solution that does not require them to purchase pesticides, reducing production costs and increasing returns.

Women: Positive low

Although women are not directly involved in the implementation (managed by national services), they participate in mango harvesting, processing, and selling. The reduction in pest damage supports their economic activities.

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

The parasitoids have successfully established in diverse agroecological zones—from humid coastal areas to subhumid inland zones—demonstrating strong adaptability to varying climates.

Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement

By reducing dependency on chemical pesticides and increasing mango resilience to pest outbreaks, the technology enhances farmers' capacity to cope with climate-induced pest pressure.

Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity

Supports biodiversity by reducing broad-spectrum pesticide use, allowing beneficial insects and natural ecosystems to thrive.

Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released

No fossil fuel inputs are required for application (no spraying or machinery), making it a low-emission intervention.

Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health

Improves environmental safety by replacing toxic pesticides with a natural solution, protecting water, soil, and non-target organisms.

Problem

  • Invasive Pest Outbreak: The mango mealybug (MM) invaded Africa in the 1980s, severely affecting fruit trees.
  • Economic Losses: The infestation caused significant financial damage for farmers and local agriculture.
  • Agricultural Sustainability Threat: The pest compromised fruit production, impacting food security and long-term sustainability.
  • Demand for Eco-Friendly Control: The situation underscored the need for sustainable, biological pest control alternatives to harmful chemicals.

Key points to design your project

The successful implementation of biocontrol using Gyranusoidea tebygi and Anagyrus mangicola has drastically reduced mango mealybug infestations, restored mango yields, and delivered long-term economic gains across multiple countries. This type of intervention requires government-led coordination, as it involves quarantine, safe release, and monitoring—steps that individual farmers or private actors cannot manage alone.

Key Steps for Integrating Mango Mealybug Biocontrol into National Projects

1. Pest Identification and Situation Analysis

  • Confirm Species: Conduct species-level identification to verify the presence of Rastrococcus invadens.

  • Assess Outbreak Context: Evaluate contributing factors such as local pesticide use or environmental conditions favoring mealybug outbreaks.

  • Engage Taxonomists: Work with entomologists to confirm pest identity and avoid confusion with other mealybugs.

2. Technical Engagement and Regulatory Setup

  • Contact IITA: Coordinate with the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) for guidance and access to parasitoid cultures.

  • Obtain Permits: Secure a quarantine permit from national authorities, supported by biosafety data in line with FAO and IPPC standards.

  • National Alignment: Ensure procedures align with national plant protection policies.

3. Importation and Controlled Release

  • Receive Starter Cultures: Import live parasitoids from authorized IITA centers or partner institutions.

  • Quarantine Clearance: Conduct inspections and approval procedures in certified quarantine stations.

  • Field Release: Deploy parasitoids at strategic locations under supervision of national pest control services.

4. Monitoring and Evaluation

  • Track Establishment: Monitor parasitoid establishment within 12 months of release.

  • Assess Spread and Control: Measure pest suppression and natural enemy dispersal across affected zones.

  • Evaluate Impact: Quantify changes in mango yield, tree recovery, and economic return. Leverage national data and collaborate with IITA for assessments.

10000 USD

Starter cultures, rearing and expert guidance

IP

No formal IP rights

Countries with a green colour
Tested & adopted
Countries with a bright green colour
Adopted
Countries with a yellow colour
Tested
Countries with a blue colour
Testing ongoing
Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d’Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Republic of the Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
Countries where the technology is being tested or has been tested and adopted
Country Testing ongoing Tested Adopted
Benin No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Burkina Faso No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Burundi No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Cameroon No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Central African Republic No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Côte d’Ivoire No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Democratic Republic of the Congo No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Gabon No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Gambia No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Ghana No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Guinea No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Nigeria No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Rwanda No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Senegal No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Sierra Leone No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
Togo No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Uganda No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted

This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
Arid
Semiarid
Subhumid
Humid

Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
Goal 2: zero hunger

Protects mango yields by controlling a major pest, contributing to food security and farmer income.

Sustainable Development Goal 12: responsible production and consumption
Goal 12: responsible production and consumption

Reduces the use of chemical pesticides, promoting safer and more sustainable production systems.

Sustainable Development Goal 13: climate action
Goal 13: climate action

Improves resilience of farming systems to climate-induced pest outbreaks without adding emissions.

Sustainable Development Goal 15: life on land
Goal 15: life on land

Supports ecological balance and biodiversity by using natural enemies instead of harmful chemicals.

Last updated on 18 April 2025