Enhancing Cassava Resilience: Targeted Biocontrol with a Beneficial Wasp
Biological control using Anagyrus lopezi is a method of managing pests naturally without relying on chemical pesticides. In this case, a small wasp from South America, A. lopezi, is used to control the cassava mealybug—a pest that damages cassava crops. The process begins by raising large numbers of these wasps in a controlled environment. Then, they are released into the field where they actively seek out the mealybugs. When a wasp finds a mealybug, it attaches itself and lays an egg on or inside the pest. Once the egg hatches, the wasp larva feeds on the mealybug from the inside, eventually killing it. This approach has been implemented in over 20 countries, reducing mealybug populations by about 90% and protecting cassava crops while saving farmers significant amounts of money.
This technology is pre-validated.
Adults 18 and over: Positive medium
Adult farmers experience increased yields and financial returns, enhancing overall community well-being.
The poor: Positive high
Cassava is a staple food for many low-income populations; effective CM control ensures food security and stabilises incomes for these communities.
Under 18: Positive low
Children benefit from improved household food security and nutrition, contributing to better health and educational outcomes.
Women: Positive high
Women, who often play key roles in cassava cultivation and processing, benefit from reduced labor and increased productivity due to effective CM management.
Climate adaptability: Moderately adaptable
By releasing A. lopezi the problem was solved. No negative impacts on alternate hosts or the environment were ever found. Interestingly the impact of A. lopezi was 90% in all ecological zones (except in dry areas) and permanent, i.e. throughout the year.
Farmer climate change readiness: Moderate improvement
Adopting biocontrol methods reduces reliance on chemical pesticides, leading to more sustainable farming practices that are better suited to adapt to climate change impacts.
Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity
Biocontrol methods preserve and enhance biodiversity by reducing the use of chemical pesticides that can harm non-target species, thereby maintaining ecological balance.
Carbon footprint: A bit less carbon released
In Africa, our travel to release and monitor CM and A. lopezi wass made by airplane and car. The initial impact and initial costs were therefore high, but of short duration only, whereas the continuous impact will have no costs.
Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health
By minimizing chemical pesticide usage, biocontrol contributes to improved environmental health, reducing soil and water contamination and protecting beneficial organisms.
Soil quality: Does not affect soil health and fertility
Reducing chemical inputs through biocontrol helps maintain soil health by preserving beneficial microorganisms essential for nutrient cycling and soil structure.
Water use: Same amount of water used
While healthier cassava plants resulting from effective pest management may have improved water use efficiency, direct impacts of biocontrol on water use are less documented.
The successful implementation of biocontrol using A. lopezi has significantly reduced pest damage, improved cassava yields, and generated substantial economic benefits at the country level. This large-scale and long-term solution can only be effectively implemented by governments. The introduction, regulation, and monitoring of biocontrol agents require coordinated action, quarantine measures, and national-level policies that individual farmers or private entities cannot manage alone.
Key Steps for Integrating Cassava Mealybug Biocontrol into National Projects
Pest Identification and Assessment
Technical Support and Regulatory Preparation
Importation, Quarantine, and Field Release
Monitoring and Impact Evaluation
Starter cultures, rearing and expert guidance
Estimation of benefits over 40 years (1974–2013) across 27 African countries
Open source / open access
Country | Testing ongoing | Tested | Adopted |
---|---|---|---|
Benin | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Burkina Faso | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Burundi | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Cameroon | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Central African Republic | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Chad | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Côte d’Ivoire | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Equatorial Guinea | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Gabon | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Gambia | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Ghana | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Guinea | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Guinea-Bissau | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Liberia | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Malawi | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Mali | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Mozambique | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Niger | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Nigeria | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
Republic of the Congo | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Senegal | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Sierra Leone | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
South Africa | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Tanzania | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Togo | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Uganda | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Zambia | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
Zimbabwe | –No ongoing testing | –Not tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arid | – | – | – | – |
Semiarid | – | – | – | – |
Subhumid | ||||
Humid |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
The establishment of A. lopezi solved a crisis by halting the cassava mealybug's destruction of cassava fields thereby safeguarding the livelihoods of millions of farmers and contributing to the reduction of poverty
The establishment of A. lopezi solved a crisis caused by the cassava mealybug's destruction of cassava fields, which are the main staple food in these countries.
Last updated on 20 March 2025