Aquaculture and Crops system for better yield
The "Integrated Aquaculture and Agriculture Systems" is like a teamwork between fish and plants. It puts fish tanks or ponds close to fields or greenhouses. This way, the water and nutrients from the fish can also be used to help the plants grow. The fish waste turns into food for the plants, and the plants help keep the water clean for the fish. It's like a natural cycle that saves money on food and helps both fish and crops grow better. It's a clever way to get more out of both fish farming and crop growing.
This technology is TAAT1 validated.
Adults 18 and over: Positive high
The poor: Positive high
Under 18: No impact
Women: Positive high
Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable
Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity
Carbon footprint: Much less carbon released
Environmental health: Does not improve environmental health
Soil quality: Improves soil health and fertility
Water use: Much less water used
Integrated Aquaculture and Agriculture Systems offers potential benefits for gender equality and climate resilience. This approach can create income opportunities in both fish and crops, potentially empowering women if they have equitable access to resources, training, and decision-making within the system. Additionally, reducing reliance on chemical fertilizers benefits the environment and contributes to achieving SDGs related to gender equality (SDG 5), responsible consumption and production (SDG 12), climate action (SDG 13), and zero hunger (SDG 2).
Here's a breakdown of key steps to consider:
Costs vary depending on project scale and chosen technologies. Here's a rough estimate range for key components:
Conduct thorough research and adapt these considerations to your specific project context. Seek expert guidance from local agricultural and aquaculture specialists.
annual maintenance cost for 0.5 ha
one square metter of hydroponic plastic beds
average net income per acre
for 0.5 ha of fully equipped aquaponic system
Open source / open access
Country | Tested | Adopted |
---|---|---|
Benin | –Not tested | Adopted |
Botswana | –Not tested | Adopted |
Burkina Faso | –Not tested | Adopted |
Burundi | –Not tested | Adopted |
Cameroon | –Not tested | Adopted |
Central African Republic | –Not tested | Adopted |
Côte d’Ivoire | –Not tested | Adopted |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | –Not tested | Adopted |
Equatorial Guinea | –Not tested | Adopted |
Ethiopia | –Not tested | Adopted |
Ghana | –Not tested | Adopted |
Kenya | –Not tested | Adopted |
Liberia | –Not tested | Adopted |
Madagascar | –Not tested | Adopted |
Niger | –Not tested | Adopted |
Nigeria | –Not tested | Adopted |
Rwanda | –Not tested | Adopted |
Senegal | –Not tested | Adopted |
Sierra Leone | –Not tested | Adopted |
South Sudan | –Not tested | Adopted |
Sudan | –Not tested | Adopted |
Tanzania | –Not tested | Adopted |
Togo | –Not tested | Adopted |
Uganda | –Not tested | Adopted |
Zambia | –Not tested | Adopted |
Zimbabwe | –Not tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arid | ||||
Semiarid | ||||
Subhumid | ||||
Humid |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
Last updated on 22 May 2024