Logo
TAAT e-catalog for government
https://e-catalogs.taat-africa.org/gov/technologies/aflasafe-aflatoxin-management
Request information View pitch brochure

Aflasafe®: Aflatoxin management

Aflatoxin-safe fields and crops for safer food in Africa

Aflasafe® is a biocontrol technology for aflatoxins management that uses harmless types of the fungus Aspergilus flavus which do not and cannot produce the toxins. The atoxigenic fungi are coated onto ordinary sorghum grain for transferring these innovative biocontrol agents to farmers’ fields. A blue food coloring dye is added to distinguish Aflasafe ® from other sorghum for food or feed use.

2

This technology is TAAT1 validated.

8•9

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 8/9; level of use 9/9

Adults 18 and over: Positive high

They benefit economically from the increased yield and market access facilitated by Aflasafe.

The poor: Positive medium

By helping increase yields and access to higher-value markets and ensuring that crops meet the necessary quality standards.

Under 18: Positive high

By helping ensure safer food, lowering the risk of stunting, liver damage, and other health issues related to aflatoxin exposure.

Women: Positive high

By enhancing the role of women in agriculture, providing them with greater economic opportunities and improving family well-being.

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

By improving crop quality and reducing losses, Aflasafe contributes to food security in regions facing changing climate conditions.

Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement

By improving crop quality and reducing aflatoxin contamination, Aflasafe helps farmers improve productivity even in suboptimal conditions.

Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity

By reducing pesticide use, Aflasafe supports a healthier agroecosystem, promoting biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.

Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health

Soil quality: Improves soil health and fertility

By reducing the need for chemical inputs, which can degrade soil quality over time.

Problem

  • Aflatoxin Contamination: Widespread and severe contamination of staple crops, animal feeds, and processed foods across Africa with aflatoxin, a highly toxic and cancer-causing poison.
  • Health Impacts: Consumption of contaminated food by humans and livestock leads to serious health issues, including liver cancer, weakened immunity, growth stunting, and organ damage.
  • Economic Impact: Aflatoxin contamination makes food unfit for consumption and trade, resulting in significant economic losses.
  • Food Safety: Ensuring safe and toxin-free food for both human and animal consumption is a challenge.

Solution

  • Aflasafe® Biocontrol: Aflasafe® is a natural biocontrol technology that uses harmless strains of Aspergillus flavus to outcompete poisonous strains, preventing aflatoxin production.
  • Safe and Cost-effective: Aflasafe® offers a safe and cost-effective solution for reducing aflatoxin levels in food.
  • Local Adaptation: The technology is well adapted to African conditions, including heat and drought, and uses native atoxigenic fungal strains.
  • Collaborative Screening: Aflasafe® products are developed through extensive field testing and screening, selecting strains that effectively reduce aflatoxin.
  • Preventing Contamination: Aflasafe® stops aflatoxin contamination at various stages, including transportation, storage, and processing, ensuring safer food supply chains.

Key points to design your project

This technology serves as a transformative solution. It is easy to use and beneficial for the producer and it offers an eco-friendly alternative to using pesticides. In addition, it supports the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by tackling hunger and improving the health of users.

To integrate this technology into your project, and create a list of project activities and prerequisites and plan these activities: 

- Considering the technology cost of 12 to 20 USD per Ha and a requirement of 10 kg per ha, estimate the quantity of products needed for your project. 

- Consider also the place of supply and include the delivery cost to the project site and account for import clearance and duties if relevant. 

A team of trainers could provide training and support during project installation. Include the cost for training and post-training support for using the technology.

Communication support for the technology should be developed (flyers, videos, radio broadcasts, etc.)

For better optimization of the improved maize variety, it is recommended to associate with other post-harvest practices such as proper drying and storage.

To implement the technology in your country, you could collaborate with agricultural development institutes and agro-dealers.

Cost: $$$ 12 - 20 USD

per Ha

ROI: $$$ 16 %

Increase in income

10 kg/ha

Recommended dosage application

4 kg/acre

Recommended dosage application

IP

Trademark

Countries with a green colour
Tested & adopted
Countries with a bright green colour
Adopted
Countries with a yellow colour
Tested
Countries with a blue colour
Testing ongoing
Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d’Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Republic of the Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
Countries where the technology is being tested or has been tested and adopted
Country Testing ongoing Tested Adopted
Burkina Faso No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Burundi No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted
Democratic Republic of the Congo No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted
Gambia No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Ghana No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Kenya No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Malawi No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Mali No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Mozambique No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Niger No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted
Nigeria No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Rwanda No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted
Senegal No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Sudan No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted
Tanzania No ongoing testing Tested Adopted
Togo No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted
Uganda No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted
Zambia No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted

This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
Arid
Semiarid
Subhumid
Humid

Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
Goal 2: zero hunger

By preventing crop losses due to aflatoxin contamination, Aflasafe boosts the productivity of smallholder farmers, supporting food availability and access in rural areas.

Sustainable Development Goal 3: good health and well-being
Goal 3: good health and well-being

Through the reduction of aflatoxin levels, Aflasafe lowers the incidence of foodborne diseases, improving the health and well-being of communities

Sustainable Development Goal 15: life on land
Goal 15: life on land

By reducing the need for chemical pesticides, Aflasafe helps protect soil and water ecosystems, reducing pollution and promoting healthier agricultural landscapes.

  1. Aflasafe® should be applied 2-3 weeks before the flowering stage of crops.
  2. It can be spread by hand, using tractor-mounted spinners.
  3. Timely application is crucial to prevent poisonous fungi from establishing.
  4. Farmers must monitor crop growth to determine the flowering stage accurately.
  5.  Aflasafe® application should align with rainfall and moist soil for effective establishment of the atoxigenic fungi.
  6. Aflasafe® is more effective when combined with good agricultural, harvest, and postharvest practices. 

Last updated on 11 December 2024