Logo
TAAT e-catalog for private sector
https://e-catalogs.taat-africa.org/com/technologies/urochloa-brachiaria-hybrid-forage-grasses-for-grazing-and-fodder-markets
Request information View pitch brochure

Urochloa (Brachiaria) hybrid forage grasses for grazing and fodder markets

High-biomass pasture that animals digest easily

This technology is a set of improved Urochloa (syn. Brachiaria) hybrid forage grasses for high biomass and good digestibility in livestock systems: Mulato II, Cobra, Cayman, and Camello. The Urochloa forage grasses are high-yielding hybrid grasses that provides abundant, good-quality feed for livestock such as cattle, sheep, and goats. They are perennial species, so once well-established does not require replanting every season and, with good management, they can remain productive for more than 10 years. The grasses can be grazed directly by animals, cut and fed fresh, or conserved as hay by drying. In areas where weather conditions do not allow proper drying, they can also be preserved as silage.

This technology is pre-validated.

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 9/9; level of use unknown

Cost vs. revenue

Data reliability of this estimate: 100 %

Return on investment 680 %

Every USD invested returns USD 6.8 net income.

Detailed financial information ›

IP

Plant variety protection

Problem

  • Dry-season feed shortages that reduce livestock performance and create strong demand for reliable fodder.
  • Low milk and meat output caused by poor-quality feed, limiting value chain growth.
  • High feeding costs because farmers and commercial farms depend on purchased feed.
  • Unreliable supply for hay/silage markets, making it hard for fodder businesses to meet dry-season demand.
  • Difficult production conditions (e.g., acidic soils, drought-prone or wetter zones), where the right hybrid can expand forage production areas and supply.

Solution

  • A high-biomass, easy-to-digest forage product to supply livestock markets.
  • Two clear business lines: seed sales (before rains) and hay sales (dry season).
  • More reliable fodder supply for dairy hubs, fatteners, and feed traders.
  • Hybrid options that fit different zones (dry, wet, cut-and-carry), expanding customer reach.

Key points to design your business plan

Key points to design your business plan

Urochloa forage grass hybrids offer a strong business opportunity because they provide high-quality feed that can be used in grazing, cut-and-carry, and hay/silage systems. The market has two clear entry points: seed sales (before the rains) and hay sales (mainly in the dry season). A business can focus on one model or combine both to generate income across seasons.

To design your business, plan activities around

  • Business model 1: Hybrid seed business (produce and/or distribute seed before the rains)
    Decide your role: licensed seed producer/multiplier (if required) or distributor/agent. Plan around peak demand before the rainy season, and build customer trust through clean seed handling, moisture-safe storage, proper packaging, and compliance with national seed rules. Because the seed is small, your product success depends on farmers using a fine seedbed and shallow planting (not deeper than 1–2 cm; never beyond 2 cm).

  • Business model 2: Hay business (produce and sell hay/fodder mainly for the dry season)
    Target livestock demand zones (dairy clusters, fattening zones, peri-urban markets). Plan production so you cut on schedule and conserve surplus. The recommended cutting rotation is shorter in the rainy season (about 25–45 days) and longer in the dry season (about 60–70 days) to keep regrowth strong and feed quality acceptable.
    Invest in basics buyers care about: reliable cutting, clean drying space, storage, transport, and (if possible) baling services.

  • Choose your product angle by hybrid “use case” (helps you sell faster)
    Example: some hybrids are especially easy to promote for cut-and-carry systems because of their growth habit and quick recovery after cutting/grazing.
    Others are easier to sell in wet/poorly drained zones because they cope better with high moisture and poor drainage.
    This “match the hybrid to the zone” approach makes your sales pitch practical and reduces complaints.

  • Sell a “minimum success package” (protect your reputation and repeat sales)
    Bundle seed (or hay) with a short guide + quick coaching + 1 demo plot/field day. Establishment failure is often linked to poor land prep and planting depth, so your support should focus on:
    fine seedbed, correct depth, and planting when rains are established (the factsheet notes sowing can start after about 30 mm rainfall).

  • Plan soil fertility support (it directly affects yield and customer satisfaction)
    The factsheet recommends DAP at planting (for root development) and annual CAN at about 100 kg/ha, preferably after rains and after harvesting when soil is wet to support regrowth.
    (You can sell this as: “seed + simple fertilizer advice” or “seed + input bundle” with partners.)

  • Build market access before you produce (sell first, then produce)
    Secure buyers early through pre-orders or seasonal agreements: agro-dealers, cooperatives, dairy hubs, feed traders, ranches, and projects. This reduces cash-flow risk and avoids late seed delivery (which kills seed sales).

  • Track simple unit economics (so you know if seed, hay, or both is best)
    Keep records: cost per hectare, seed/hay output, cutting cycle, loss in storage/transport, selling price, and net margin. This helps you scale what works and drop what doesn’t.

For best results, combine both models: sell hybrid seed before the rains, then sell hay in the dry season, while protecting quality through correct planting guidance and good drying/storage management. (Good establishment matters because first cut is typically 70–80 days after planting, then rotation continues through the year.)

Implementing partners could collaborate with Alliance Bioversity International & CIAT (Tropical Forages), seed regulators, seed companies, agro-dealer networks, dairy cooperatives/milk hubs, feed traders, and farmer groups (including women and youth) to build stable supply and strong markets.

Positive impacts: 8

Target groups Positive impacts
Women in male-headed households (insecure land rights), responsible for fodder Save time when forage is produced near home; earn income from fodder/cuttings; possible increase in joint decision-making.
Female-headed households (widows/divorced), small land size More control over milk/hay sales; diversified income; better feed security.
Youth (women/men) with little land, underemployment/migration Jobs and small businesses (planting material, cutting, baling, transport, sales); skills development and service provision.
Agro-pastoralists/pastoralists (collective tenure), dry zones Better dry-season resilience (fodder banks); fewer livestock losses in the dry season.
Peri-urban “zero-grazing” smallholders (often women: feeding/milking) Lower purchased feed costs; more stable feeding; more regular milk income.
Wealthier/commercial producers and cooperative leaders Faster adoption (irrigation/mechanization); stronger hay/seed markets; higher productivity.
Landless farm workers (daily laborers), often women More paid work during land prep, weeding, cutting, baling; seasonal income.
Remote areas / marginalized groups (weak extension, strong land norms) Women’s groups can access seed/cuttings and sell; improved animal feeding.
More...

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

Works well where it is adapted in warm humid and subhumid tropical and sub-tropical environments

Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement

Forage and livestock producers benefit in quality forage for their animals including in relatively marginal areas

Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity

Creates micro-environment support thriving biodiversity

Carbon footprint: Much less carbon released

Reduces emission a lot through C sequestration through roots turnover, especially that they are perennial grasses

Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health

Reduces soil erosion and provide soil cover, fixes carbon through roots turnover.

Soil quality: Improves soil health and fertility

Improves soil structure and carbon. Reduces soil erosion keeping the productive topsoil in place.

Water use: Same amount of water used

The grasses have competitive productivity water use efficiency. The grasses accumulate appreciable amount of biomass per unit of water utilized

Positive impact 8

Target groups Positive impacts
Women in male-headed households (insecure land rights), responsible for fodder Save time when forage is produced near home; earn income from fodder/cuttings; possible increase in joint decision-making.
Female-headed households (widows/divorced), small land size More control over milk/hay sales; diversified income; better feed security.
Youth (women/men) with little land, underemployment/migration Jobs and small businesses (planting material, cutting, baling, transport, sales); skills development and service provision.
Agro-pastoralists/pastoralists (collective tenure), dry zones Better dry-season resilience (fodder banks); fewer livestock losses in the dry season.
Peri-urban “zero-grazing” smallholders (often women: feeding/milking) Lower purchased feed costs; more stable feeding; more regular milk income.
Wealthier/commercial producers and cooperative leaders Faster adoption (irrigation/mechanization); stronger hay/seed markets; higher productivity.
Landless farm workers (daily laborers), often women More paid work during land prep, weeding, cutting, baling; seasonal income.
Remote areas / marginalized groups (weak extension, strong land norms) Women’s groups can access seed/cuttings and sell; improved animal feeding.

Unintended impact 8

Target groups Unintended impacts Mitigation measures
Women in male-headed households (insecure land rights) Workload shifts to women/girls (cutting/transport); income may be captured by others; overall overload. Promote labor-saving tools (choppers, carts) and shared labor; use women-managed group sales/payments; include household dialogue on benefit sharing.
Female-headed households (small land size) Overwork due to limited labor; weaker access to equipment/markets; risk of local capture. Group labor arrangements; access to hired services (cutting/chopping/baling); collective marketing and transparent payments.
Youth with little land Benefits captured by elders/elites; jobs can be hard/unstable; exclusion without capital. Transparent selection and youth quotas; starter kits/credit + coaching; fair wage guidance and safer working conditions.
Agro-pastoralists/pastoralists (collective tenure) Enclosure/privatization; conflicts over access; commons displaced; inequality within community (gender/age). Participatory land-use agreements; community by-laws with women/youth representation; local conflict-resolution mechanisms.
Peri-urban zero-grazing (often women) More daily cutting (especially in cut-and-carry systems); “food vs fodder” land conflict; workload increase. Promote small high-yield plots and efficient cutting schedules; labor-saving chopping; integrate fodder planning with household food production.
Wealthier/commercial producers & coop leaders Capture of subsidies/certified seed; land pressure; market power against smallholders. Targeting rules for support; transparent distribution; inclusive contracting with smallholders; monitor elite capture risks.
Landless workers (often women) Drudgery; herbicide exposure; unequal pay; no protection. PPE + safe herbicide training; enforce basic labor standards; grievance channels; encourage mechanized services where feasible.
Remote/marginalized groups Spread of low-quality seed; women excluded from land/markets; inequalities reinforced. Quality assurance and certified supply channels; inclusive community sensitization; women’s group market linkages and safeguards.

Barriers 8

Target groups Barriers to adoption Mitigation measures
Women in male-headed households (insecure land rights) Limited land access and decisions; low coop membership; limited seed/finance access; hard cutting/chopping work. Secure dedicated plots via community/household agreements; support women’s groups/coops; seed vouchers + small credit; tool banks (choppers/carts).
Female-headed households (small land size) Land size/tenure; credit constraints; limited labor; limited access to quality seed/inputs. Small-plot packages; credit guarantees/savings groups; paid services for labor peaks; strengthen seed access points.
Youth with little land Land access; capital/equipment; market networks; training gaps. Lease community plots; equipment rental hubs; incubation + training; buyer linkages (dairy/fattening zones).
Agro-pastoralists/pastoralists (collective tenure) Limited access to adapted seed; weak local governance; few services; distant markets. Decentralized seed supply; mobile extension; strengthen local governance rules; aggregation/transport support.
Peri-urban zero-grazing Severe land constraint; need practical advice; seed must be timely and affordable. Micro-plot approaches; short coaching + demos; pre-rain seed distribution; affordable starter packs.
Wealthier/commercial producers & coop leaders Fewer constraints; mainly regulatory clarity and seed quality. Clear licensing/quality standards; enforce seed quality control and traceability.
Landless workers (often women) No decision power; low access to training/PPE; job insecurity. Include workers in safety/training; ensure PPE access; formalize service groups (cutting/baling teams) with fair terms.
Remote/marginalized groups Isolation and transport costs; low access to seed/training; weak market outlets. Local seed points; mobile trainings; transport/logistics support; collective marketing through groups/coops.

Cost of the investment
Sum of all fixed and operational expenses.
USD 2,616
Per hectare over 10 years
Gross revenue
Sum of all income before subtracting costs.
USD 20,400
Per hectare over 10 years
Net income
Gross revenue minus total cost.
USD 17,784
Per hectare over 10 years
Return on investment
Percentage of income earned for each dollar invested, calculated as:
(income ÷ cost of investment) × 100
680 %
Over 10 years

References:

  • Drought-resilient Urochloa forage for year-round livestock feeding_CostRevenueROI_Date.pdf (PDF, 60.43 KB)
  • Countries with a green colour
    Tested & adopted
    Countries with a bright green colour
    Adopted
    Countries with a yellow colour
    Tested
    Countries with a blue colour
    Testing ongoing
    Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d’Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Republic of the Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
    Countries where the technology is being tested or has been tested and adopted
    Country Testing ongoing Tested Adopted
    Ethiopia No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted
    Kenya No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
    Rwanda No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted
    Tanzania No ongoing testing Tested Not adopted

    This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

    Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
    AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
    Arid
    Semiarid
    Subhumid
    Humid

    Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

    The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

    Sustainable Development Goal 1: no poverty
    Goal 1: no poverty

    Higher livestock productivity and new income options (seed and hay businesses)

    Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
    Goal 2: zero hunger

    More reliable milk and meat production because feed is available across seasons

    Sustainable Development Goal 5: gender equality
    Goal 5: gender equality

    Opportunities for women and youth in seed/hay value chains, and less time pressure when feed is produced closer to home

    Sustainable Development Goal 10: reduced inequalities
    Goal 10: reduced inequalities

    Time savings for women can reduce workload gaps and support participation in income activities

    Sustainable Development Goal 13: climate action
    Goal 13: climate action

    Better feed availability during dry periods and climate shocks, reducing vulnerability of livestock systems

    1. Site selection and land preparation
      Choose a well-drained field and prepare a clean, fine seedbed (the seeds are small). If the field has tough weeds (e.g., couch grass), herbicide spraying is advised. Plough to about 25 cm and harrow to get a fine tilth; if possible, avoid very sloping or uneven land.
    2. Planting (start of the rainy season)
      Start planting when rains have started well. The factsheet notes that seeding can begin after about 30 mm of rainfall.
    3. Seeding rate and method (hybrids)
      Use about 7–10 kg of seed per hectare (your hybrid note). From the factsheet, you can apply it as: Row planting: rows 40–50 cm apart (around 8 kg/ha). Broadcast sowing: about 10–12 kg/ha.
    4. Cover the seed lightly (do not bury deep)
      After sowing, cover the seed lightly (e.g., with a harrow). On small plots, use tree branches or large brooms to cover seeds with soil. Keep seed depth around 1–2 cm (do not exceed 2 cm).
    5. Weed control during establishment
      Keep the plot free of weeds during the first 6–8 weeks so the grass can establish well (from your draft text).
    6. Fertilisation / manure
      At planting, apply a phosphorus-dominated fertilizer (DAP) to support root development. Then apply CAN at 100 kg/ha per year; apply after rains and ideally after harvesting when the soil is wet to support regrowth. In poor soils, farmers can also top up with manure.
    7. First cut or first grazing
      For the hybrids, first use is after about 70–80 days (your hybrid note + confirmed in the factsheet for hybrids).
    8. Regular harvesting / grazing schedule (help the grass recover)
      Once well established, follow a rotation so the grass recovers and stays good for animals: 25–45 days in the rainy season, and 60–70 days in the dry season.

    Last updated on 25 March 2026