High-Performance Breeding Chicken Breed
"Dual-Purpose Chicken for Small-Scale Producers" technology is the development and distribution of chicken breeds capable of both high egg production and meat yield. These dual-purpose chickens are specifically engineered to possess a combination of desirable traits such as low cost, disease resistance, heat tolerance, and efficient feed utilization. In essence, "Dual-Purpose Chicken for Small-Scale Producers" is a comprehensive technology focusing on the development, distribution, and utilization of specialized chicken breeds that serve both meat and egg production purposes, catering to the needs and capabilities of small-scale poultry farming in various African regions.
This technology is TAAT1 validated.
The technology has been integrated in the ENSURE project: in 7 regions of the East African Community
Goal: 3,000,000 farmers (50% women)
149,940 lead farmers and promoters trained
Budget: USD 13.14 million
Implementation period: 2024–2027
Weight of chickens in 3 months
Production by chickens per year
Open source / open access
Using Dual-Purpose Chicken for Small-Scale Producers increases poultry productivity, enhances food security, and fosters sustainable livelihoods in rural communities. By offering disease-resistant and cost-effective chickens, the technology aims to advance sustainable development.
As crucial partners, sellers of the product play an indispensable role.
In terms of cost considerations, a 100 to 150 m2 room is suitable for rearing 1000 to 2,000 chicks for 4-5 weeks, accommodating spaces for a brooder unit, growers house, and equipment/utility store. The estimated cost is approximately US $930 to purchase and rear 1000 birds for five weeks.
Regarding profitability, a standard brooding unit in Nigeria yields a profit margin of 30% per batch, depending on feed reliance and costs. Under smallholder conditions, these chickens can reach a weight of 1.5 kg to 2.0 kg in 3 months and produce about 120 to 180 eggs annually. This contrasts with indigenous chickens, which weigh 1.2 kg to 1.7 kg after six months and lay only 75 eggs per year.
To optimize outcomes, establish partnerships with agricultural development institutes and viable commercial production entities to provide support and assist in distribution. Additionally, enhance optimization by integrating with complementary technologies such as Artificial Hatching in Semi-Automatic Incubators.
Adults 18 and over: Positive high
Engaging in poultry farming with dual-purpose chickens can attract younger generations to agriculture, offering them entrepreneurial opportunities and a sustainable livelihood.
The poor: Positive low
The breed’s adaptability makes it suitable for local conditions, reducing input costs and increasing resilience.
Under 18: Positive low
Access to locally bred chickens can improve nutrition by providing a regular source of protein from eggs and meat.
Women: Positive high
Many women in rural areas engage in poultry farming. This dual-purpose breed can empower them by generating income from both egg and meat production, boosting economic independence.
Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable
Small-scale, dual-purpose poultry systems are generally less energy-intensive than large commercial poultry operations, contributing to a smaller carbon footprint by reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with industrial-scale farming.
Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement
Dual-purpose breeds require fewer resources compared to industrialized poultry systems. They are typically more adaptable to local conditions
Biodiversity: No impact on biodiversity
It helps preserve genetic diversity in poultry populations, which is often threatened by reliance on a limited number of commercial breeds.
Carbon footprint: Same amount of carbon released
Small-scale, dual-purpose poultry systems are generally less energy-intensive than large commercial poultry operations. It reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with industrial-scale farming.
Scaling Readiness describes how complete a technology’s development is and its ability to be scaled. It produces a score that measures a technology’s readiness along two axes: the level of maturity of the idea itself, and the level to which the technology has been used so far.
Each axis goes from 0 to 9 where 9 is the “ready-to-scale” status. For each technology profile in the e-catalogs we have documented the scaling readiness status from evidence given by the technology providers. The e-catalogs only showcase technologies for which the scaling readiness score is at least 8 for maturity of the idea and 7 for the level of use.
The graph below represents visually the scaling readiness status for this technology, you can see the label of each level by hovering your mouse cursor on the number.
Read more about scaling readiness ›
Semi-controlled environment: prototype
Common use by projects NOT connected to technology provider
| Maturity of the idea | Level of use | |||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||
Enabling Environments for Sustainable Regional Agriculture Extension (ENSURE)
Project funder: African Development Bank & East Africa Community
Planned Budget: USD 13.14 million
Location: East African Community (Burundi, DRC, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda)
Planned duration: 2024–2027
Deployment means: On-farm demonstrations, training, digital tools (SMS, IVR, video, radio, pictorial guides), bundled inputs + advisory services, Training of Trainers (ToT)
Project main implementer: East African Community (EAC)
Project Description: Strengthen agricultural extension systems using digital tools, private-sector approaches, regional coordination, and multi-commodity focus (maize, cassava, rice, drought-resilient crops).
Objective: Promote regional extension, enhance advisory services, scale climate-smart technologies, build sustainable private sector–led extension systems, strengthen policy and regulatory frameworks.
Expected outcome: Increased adoption of improved technologies, improved farmer productivity and profitability, enhanced access to quality inputs and pest management solutions, strengthened resilience to climate and pest risks, regional market integration, job creation for youth and agripreneurs.
Figures of adoption: Target 3 million farmers reached over 4 years, digital extension pilots in 7 EAC states, training of extension agents, lead farmers, cooperatives, and youth agripreneurs, rollout of Pest Information Management Systems (PIMS).
Profiles of adopters: Smallholder farmers, women, youth agripreneurs, cooperatives and producer organizations, public and private extension agents, National Plant Protection Officers (NPPOs).
Lessons learnt: System-level approaches needed beyond technology delivery, digital tools most effective with in-person facilitation, supportive policy/regulatory environment critical, regional harmonization boosts scalability and cross-border diffusion of technologies.
| Country | Testing ongoing | Tested | Adopted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benin | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Botswana | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Burundi | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Central African Republic | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Côte d’Ivoire | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Ethiopia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Gabon | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Ghana | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Guinea | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Kenya | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Madagascar | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Malawi | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Niger | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Nigeria | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Rwanda | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Senegal | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Sierra Leone | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Somalia | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| South Sudan | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Tanzania | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
| Uganda | –No ongoing testing | Tested | Adopted |
This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.
| AEZ | Subtropic - warm | Subtropic - cool | Tropic - warm | Tropic - cool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arid | ||||
| Semiarid | ||||
| Subhumid | ||||
| Humid |
Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.
It helps enhance agricultural productivity, ensuring that more households can access affordable, locally-produced food.
Improved access to high-quality protein from eggs and chicken meat contributes to better nutrition and overall health, especially in rural and underserved populations.
It creates opportunities for rural entrepreneurship and economic growth, particularly in low-income communities.
Last updated on 9 April 2026