Logo
TAAT e-catalog for private sector
https://e-catalogs.taat-africa.org/com/technologies/high-biomass-megathyrsus-panicum-forage-cultivars-for-cut-and-carry-and-grazing
Request information View pitch brochure

High-biomass Megathyrsus (Panicum) forage cultivars for cut-and-carry and grazing

High-biomass, drought-tolerant forage for reliable feed all year

This technology is a set of improved Megathyrsus maximus (syn. Panicum maximum) forage grass cultivars for livestock feeding: Mombasa, Tanzania, and Massai. They are improved forage grasses developed to deliver high biomass yields (10–20 t DM/ha/year) under tropical conditions. Selected for drought tolerance (500–600 mm rainfall) and good nutritional quality (8–12% crude protein; 55–65% digestibility), they ensure reliable year-round feed supply. Established through seeding or splits in well-prepared seedbeds, these cultivars show rapid regrowth and strong persistence, while their deep root systems improve soil structure and reduce erosion, supporting sustainable livestock production systems.

This technology is pre-validated.

Scaling readiness: idea maturity 9/9; level of use unknown

Cost vs. revenue

Data reliability of this estimate: 100 %

Return on investment 680 %

Every USD invested returns USD 6.8 net income.

Detailed financial information ›

IP

Open source / open access

Problem

Seasonal Feed Shortages and Declining Livestock Productivity:

  • Recurrent dry-season feed scarcity significantly reduces milk production and weight gain in smallholder systems.
  • Traditional pastures produce only 2–4 t DM/ha/year, which is insufficient to sustain consistent animal performance throughout the year.

Climate Variability and Drought Stress:

  • Irregular rainfall patterns and prolonged dry periods limit forage availability and increase vulnerability of livestock systems.
  • Low-resilience pasture species fail under rainfall below 700 mm/year, worsening feed insecurity.

Soil Degradation and Low Pasture Sustainability:

  • Overgrazing and poor pasture management contribute to soil erosion and declining soil fertility.
  • Shallow-rooted native grasses provide limited soil stabilization, accelerating land degradation and reducing long-term productivity.

Solution

  1. Increased Forage Productivity: Significant improvement in biomass production (10–20 t DM/ha/year), overcoming the low yields (2–4 t DM/ha/year) of traditional pastures and ensuring year-round feed availability.
  2. Enhanced Drought Resilience: Strong tolerance to low rainfall (500–600 mm/year), reducing feed shortages during dry seasons and stabilizing livestock performance.
  3. Improved Livestock Performance: Good nutritional quality (8–12% crude protein; 55–65% digestibility) supporting higher milk yields, better weight gain, and improved animal health.
  4. Soil Restoration and Sustainability: Deep and dense root systems that improve soil structure, reduce erosion, and enhance nutrient retention, contributing to long-term pasture sustainability.

Key points to design your business plan

The commercialization of Megathyrsus maximus cultivars offers a viable, high-return alternative to low-productivity natural pastures in livestock systems. With biomass yields of 10–20 t DM/ha/year compared to 2–4 t DM/ha/year from traditional grazing lands, this climate-smart forage significantly increases feed availability, stabilizes animal performance, and reduces seasonal production losses. Its drought tolerance (500–600 mm/year), strong persistence under grazing, and rapid regrowth make it a reliable, scalable input for dairy and beef value chains.

By supplying certified seed of improved cultivars such as Mombasa, Tanzania, and Massai, seed companies and agri-enterprises can address chronic feed shortages while positioning themselves within the growing climate-smart livestock market. The technology requires relatively low infrastructure investment, offers strong repeat demand, and creates opportunities for decentralized seed multiplication and distribution networks. It supports expansion of commercial forage markets, strengthens livestock productivity, and enhances resilience across the value chain.

To integrate this technology into your agribusiness model, consider the following key steps:

  • Assess Market Demand:
    Estimate forage seed demand across livestock production zones, identify dairy and beef clusters, and define realistic annual seed supply targets based on a seeding rate of 3 kg/ha.
  • Develop Seed Production Systems:
    Establish certified seed production fields or partner with contract growers for decentralized multiplication, ensuring quality control and varietal purity.
  • Strengthen Technical Capacity:
    Train production and field teams on seed production standards, post-harvest handling, storage conditions, and advisory services for proper pasture establishment and management.
  • Build Market Demand and Awareness:
    Use demonstration plots, field days, livestock farmer associations, radio campaigns, and digital outreach to highlight yield advantages, drought tolerance, and economic returns.
  • Secure Strategic Partnerships:
    Collaborate with national research institutions, livestock development programs, extension networks, and agro-dealer systems to ensure access to adapted cultivars, technical validation, and sustained market expansion.

Adults 18 and over: Positive high

Engagement in livestock production, hay production and sale

Others: No impact

None

The poor: Positive medium

Forage for livestock

Under 18: Positive high

Engagement in hay production and sale

Women: Positive high

Engage in production with less time looking for forage, hay production, seedling production for sale

Climate adaptability: Highly adaptable

It works well where it is adapted in the tropical and sub-tropical environments

Farmer climate change readiness: Significant improvement

The forages are relatively drought tolerant and once established do not require to be planted every season. With good management can last 10 years before re-planting again

Biodiversity: Positive impact on biodiversity

It helps them grow and thrive as creates amenable micro-environment

Environmental health: Greatly improves environmental health

Prevents soil erosion through deep roots that also sequester carbon through roots turnover. Provides soil cover and promotes biodiversity

Soil quality: Does not affect soil health and fertility

Although the grasses take nutrients from the soil for good growth and biomass accumulation, manure accumulated by animals fed on the same can be ploughed back thus nutrient cycling which is desirable

Water use: Same amount of water used

Productivity water use efficiency would be high compared to most crops as the target use is the biomass

Cost of the investment
Sum of all fixed and operational expenses.
USD 2,616
Per hectare over 10 years
Gross revenue
Sum of all income before subtracting costs.
USD 20,400
Per hectare over 10 years
Net income
Gross revenue minus total cost.
USD 17,784
Per hectare over 10 years
Return on investment
Percentage of income earned for each dollar invested, calculated as:
(income ÷ cost of investment) × 100
680 %
Over 10 years

References:

  • Drought-resilient Urochloa forage for year-round livestock feeding_CostRevenueROI_Date.pdf (PDF, 60.43 KB)
  • Countries with a green colour
    Tested & adopted
    Countries with a bright green colour
    Adopted
    Countries with a yellow colour
    Tested
    Countries with a blue colour
    Testing ongoing
    Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burundi Burkina Faso Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Côte d’Ivoire Eritrea Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Cameroon Kenya Libya Liberia Madagascar Mali Malawi Morocco Mauritania Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Republic of the Congo Rwanda Zambia Senegal Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Somalia South Sudan Sudan South Africa Eswatini Tanzania Togo Tunisia Chad Uganda Western Sahara Central African Republic Lesotho
    Countries where the technology is being tested or has been tested and adopted
    Country Testing ongoing Tested Adopted
    Ethiopia No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted
    Kenya No ongoing testing Not tested Adopted

    This technology can be used in the colored agro-ecological zones. Any zones shown in white are not suitable for this technology.

    Agro-ecological zones where this technology can be used
    AEZ Subtropic - warm Subtropic - cool Tropic - warm Tropic - cool
    Arid
    Semiarid
    Subhumid
    Humid

    Source: HarvestChoice/IFPRI 2009

    The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals that are applicable to this technology.

    Sustainable Development Goal 1: no poverty
    Goal 1: no poverty

    Increased livestock productivity; increased incomes; income diversification

    Sustainable Development Goal 2: zero hunger
    Goal 2: zero hunger

    More animal source food (meat, milk) is available for humans

    Sustainable Development Goal 5: gender equality
    Goal 5: gender equality

    Creates opportunities for women and youth to participate in forage seed and forage value chains, while also reducing labor demands, especially for women.

    Sustainable Development Goal 13: climate action
    Goal 13: climate action

    Increases animal stocking rates and reduces environmental footprint per unit product (emission reductions, land sparing, carbon sequestration)

    1. Seedbed Preparation: Prepare a fine seedbed to ensure optimal establishment of Megathyrsus maximus cultivars.
    2. Planting: Sow seeds at 3 kg/ha or use seedlings/splits for establishment.
    3. Fertilization and Weed Control: Apply fertilizers or organic manure to boost growth and control weeds during the first weeks after planting.
    4. Harvesting and Grazing: Begin harvesting or grazing 90 days after planting, leaving 10–15 cm stubble to allow regrowth; repeat cutting or grazing every 6–8 weeks to maintain high-quality forage.

    Last updated on 25 March 2026